Neurocognitive Deficit After Paediatric Transplantation: Understanding the Role of Environment and Physical Function

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age0-18
SponsorRigshospitalet, Denmark

About this trial

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially life-saving treatment for children with relapsed or resistant leukemia and other life-threatening hematological and hereditary disorders. In Denmark, around 25 children undergo allogeneic HSCT every year, of these approximately 85-90% survive into adulthood.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about neurocognitive outcomes in children undergoing (HSCT) and to understand which clinical, physical, and environmental factors may affect neurocognitive development during the first year after transplant. The main questions it aims to answer are:

How does neurocognitive function change from before HSCT to one year after transplantation in pediatric patients?

Which clinical, physical, and environmental factors are linked to better or worse neurocognitive outcomes?

Participants will:

Complete neurocognitive tests before HSCT and at 1-year follow-up, covering intelligence, memory, attention, executive function, processing speed, and motor skills.

Undergo physical tests before HSCT, at hospital discharge, at 6-months follow-up, and at 1-year follow-up, including muscle strength, mobility, endurance, balance, and cardiopulmonary fitness (only at 1-year follow-up).

Wear activity trackers to measure physical activity and sedentary time during hospitalization at 6 months and 1-year post-HSCT.

Complete questionnaires about sleep, pain, quality of life, fatigue, family background, and exposure to outdoor and green spaces.

Have medical records reviewed for treatment-related side effects, immune recovery, inflammation, and pain management.

This study will help understand how neurocognitive function develops after HSCT in children and which factors (clinical, physical, or environmental) may support better recovery and well-being.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Recipient of allogeneic HSCT in the study period

HSCT at the pediatric ward

Age <18 years at referral to HSCT

Signed informed consent

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

Patients: In Denmark 20-25 children below the age of 18 years undergo HSCT every year, which means that 100-125 patients will be eligible for inclusion in the study period. To increase the total number of participants available only for 1-year outcome analyses, we will additionally include \~25 patients, in a "catch-up cohort". These participants will undergo the same 1 year follow-up assessments, Parents At least one parent per included patient will be included as a study participant. Inclusion criteria for parents 1. Parent or legal guardian of an included patient 2. Present during the child's hospitalization (the parent most often staying with the child) 3. Able to speak and understand Danish 4. Signed informed consent Exclusion criteria for parents 1\) Inability to understand or complete the questionnaire in Danish

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

100 Participants
are grouped into 1 trial group
Group A: Pediaric HSCT patients

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Performance on clinical neurocognitive tests

Scores on the clinical neurocognitive tests (Bayley-III: Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition, WPPSY-IV: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence 2.6-7.7 years of age, WISC-V: Wechler Intelligence Scale for Children Fifth edition for participants 7-15.9 years of age, WAIS-IV: Wechler Adult Intelligence Scale Fourth edition for participants 16 years of age or older). Tested domains: Non-verbal reasoning, verbal reasoning, Working memory, Processing Speed Scaled scores range from 0-19, higher = better performance.

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT
2

Performance on clinical neurocognitive tests - Excecutive functioning

Excecutive functioning will be tested using D-KEFS (Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System) for all participants \>8 y of age.

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT
3

Performance on clinical neurocognitive tests - Sustained attention

Sustained attention will be tested using CPT-3 (Conners Continuous Performance Test, 3rd Edition) for for all participants \>8 y of age

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT
4

Performance on clinical neurocognitive tests - Visuomotor functions

Visuomotor functions will be tested using Beery VMI (Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration)

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT

Secondary outcomes

1

Isometric Muscle Strength

Isometric knee strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer (CITEC handheld dynamometer, type 3002, CIT Technics, Haren, Netherlands). Maximum isometric contraction will be evaluated using the "break technique" (Beenakker et al, 2001). The highest value out of three repetitions will be counted as the maximum strength and kept for analysis. The handheld dynamometry method has shown high validity (r = 0.74 and r = 0.98) and moderate intertester reliability (r = 0.42 to r = 0.73) in healthy and chronically ill children and adolescents (Brussock CM et al. (1992)), (Stuberg WA et al (1988)) and is considered a reliable and valid instrument for muscle strength assessment in a clinical setting compared to the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry (Stark T et al (2011)).

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T1: During HSCT (at discharge, or day +42 at latest) T2: 6 months post HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT
2

Handgrip strength

Handgrip strength will be measured using a hand-held dynamometer. Participants are placed in a seated position with the elbow flexed at 90°, with three attempts performed for each hand. During testing, the participant will be encouraged to exhibit the best possible force, and the best measure in the strongest hand will be used as the test score. Handgrip strength is also used as a surrogate measure for upper-body physical function (Bohannon RW et al (2001)), Adam C et al (1988))

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T1: During HSCT (at discharge, or day +42 at latest) T2: 6 months post HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT
3

Muscle performance: Sit-to-stand 30 sec.

Sit-to-Stand 30 sec: The participant sits on a chair allowing the participant to flex the legs at a 90 degree angle. The participant is instructed to stand up straight, and return to sitting, as many times as possible in 30 sec. The arms should be crossed in front of the body or hanging by the side. Number of repititions is the outcome.

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T1: During HSCT (at discharge, or day +42 at latest) T2: 6 months post HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT
4

Muscle performance: Sit-to-stand 60 sec.

Sit-to-Stand 60 sec: The participant sits on a chair allowing the participant to flex the legs at a 90 degree angle. The participant is instructed to stand up straight, and return to sitting, as many times as possible in 60 sec. The arms should be crossed in front of the body or hanging by the side. Number of repititions is the outcome.

Time frame
T0: Within 30 days prior to HSCT T1: During HSCT (at discharge, or day +42 at latest) T2: 6 months post HSCT T3: 1 year post HSCT

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Lead sponsor

Jascha Fonden

Collaborator

The Dagmar Marshall Foundation

Collaborator

Gangsted Foundation

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: