Neurofeedback Based on Near-infrared Spectroscopy as a Therapy for Food Addiction in Obese Subjects.

ConditionsObesityCraving
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-55
SponsorRennes University Hospital

About this trial

The hypothesis is that the increase in dlPFC brain activity via near-infrared spectroscopy-based Neurofeedback (fNIRS-based NF) training based on near-infrared spectroscopy would allow an improvement of the eating behavior, thus promoting a long-term weight loss in obese subjects.

Patients will be trained during a month with 8 NF sessions and results based on clinical data and different questionnaires results will be compared between inclusion and 3 months later

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Eligible for obesity surgery according to the 2009 French High Authority on Health (HAS) criteria (BMI ≥40 or BMI ≥35 with comorbidities)

Right-handed

Presenting a food addiction determined by the YFAS 2.0 questionnaire ;

Affiliated to a social security system;

Disqualifiers

Psychotic psychiatric disorders (schizophrenic disorders and bipolar disorders);

Psychotropic drugs, except antidepressants stabilized for at least 3 weeks and benzodiazepines

Addiction to alcohol or other psychoactive substances (except tobacco);

History of bariatric surgery;

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Sham

    Other intervention

    The sham protocol will last 15 minutes per session, and during each session, the participants will receive the same instruction but will be shown a random signal, the goal being that the control strategy that the participant tries to implement is not correlated with the visual feedback provided by the gauge.

  • NF

    Other intervention

    The neurofeedback protocol will be the same during the 8 sessions constituting the protocol and taking place over a period of 4 weeks (2 neurofeedback sessions per week, the first and the last one in an MRI context). It will last 15 minutes per session, and during each session, the patient will have to increase the brain activity of her dlPFC using a visual gauge representing the "activity level" of her own dlPFC. No specific instructions will be given to the volunteer so that he/she can develop his/her own internal strategy to increase this "activity level".

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: NFExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: ShamSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Number of patients who have a difference in resting state IRM after NF session

Difference in resting state IRM at inclusion and at 1 month after the 8th NF session between sham and experimental. Resting state IRM will allow to determine the correlation coefficient of the IRM BOLD signal fluctuations between the dlPFC and the striatum. The evolution of cognitive control by NeuroFeedback (NF) will thus be determined by a variation of this correlation coefficient and thus of the cortico-striatal connectivity at inclusion and after the 8th NF session.

Time frame
1 month

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of patients who have a difference in resting state IRM after NF training in the cognitive food anticipation task condition

Variation in hemodynamic BOLD response in the cognitive food anticipation task condition between V1 and V8 between groups (NF vs sham). Difference in resting state IRM at inclusion and at 1 month after the 8th NF session between sham and experimental. Resting state IRM will allow to determine the correlation coefficient of the IRM BOLD signal fluctuations between the dlPFC and the striatum. The evolution of cognitive control by NeuroFeedback (NF) will thus be determined by a variation of this correlation coefficient and thus of the cortico-striatal connectivity at inclusion and after the 8th NF session.

Time frame
1 month
2

Difference in blood pressure status 3 months after NF training

Evolution of health status using blood pressure (mmHg) between groups (NF vs sham) before and after participation (between V0 and V9).

Time frame
4 months
3

Difference in blood pressure status 3 months after NF training

Evolution of health status using clinical exam criteria between groups (NF vs sham) before and after participation (between V0 and V9).

Time frame
4 months
4

Difference in biological check up 3 months after NF training

Evolution of health status using biological check up between groups (NF vs sham) before and after participation (between V0 and V9).

Time frame
4 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.