Neurofeedback for Pain Sensitization in Knee Osteoarthritis

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age45+
SponsorNortheastern University

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a training method called neurofeedback is safe and practical to use in people with knee osteoarthritis (knee OA). Neurofeedback uses a computer screen to show people their body's responses as they happen, so they can learn to change those responses. The response being trained in this study is a protective reflex in the leg. This reflex is often stronger than normal in people with knee OA, which may be a sign that their nervous system has become more sensitive to pain.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

1. Is this training safe, and what side effects do people have? 2. Can people with knee OA complete the training, and do they find it acceptable?

Researchers will compare people who receive real neurofeedback training with people who receive a placebo (inactive) version of the training. In the placebo version, the electrical pulses are too weak to trigger the reflex, and what appears on the screen is not based on the person's own reflex. Comparing the two groups helps researchers tell which parts of taking part are difficult because of the study set-up itself and which are difficult because of the training.

Participants will:

* Visit a research laboratory at Northeastern University in Boston 7 times: one measurement visit lasting about 3 hours, then 6 training visits lasting about 60 to 90 minutes each. Training visits happen about twice a week, with at least 2 days between visits. * At the measurement visit, have small sensors placed on the head and legs, receive brief electrical pulses to the leg and brief magnetic pulses to the head, and have their sensitivity to pain checked using brief pressure on the kneecaps and wrist. * At each training visit, receive brief electrical pulses to the leg while watching a screen. People in the neurofeedback group will try to make a bar on the screen smaller. People in the placebo group will watch a screen that does not reflect their own reflex. * Answer questionnaires about their knee pain and daily activities. * Receive a phone call and complete a short online survey about 2 weeks after the last training visit.

A smaller group of participants will take part in the measurement visit only. They may not receive neurofeedback or placebo training.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 45 years or older

Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis meeting the clinical definition in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines: knee pain for more than 3 months and morning stiffness lasting less than 30 minutes

Able to speak and understand English

Able to attend all study visits at the study site in Boston, MA

Disqualifiers

Pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or other implanted electronic device

Metal implants in the head

Implants in the lower limb, including prior knee arthroplasty

History of seizures or epilepsy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • FWR Down-Conditioning Neurofeedback

    Other intervention

    Participants receive trial-by-trial feedback of flexor withdrawal reflex amplitude.

  • Sham Feedback

    Other intervention

    Participants receive sham trial-by-trial feedback of flexor withdrawal reflex amplitude. The placebo condition is matched on instrumentation, session structure, stimulation triggering, and visit burden, and differs in stimulation intensity and in whether displayed feedback derives from the participant's own reflex.

Treatment groups

50 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: FWR Down-Conditioning NeurofeedbackExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham FeedbackPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of adverse events

Number of participants with at least one adverse event and total event count, characterized by nature, severity, relationship to study procedures, and timing. Serious adverse events reported separately.

Time frame
Enrollment through 14 days after the final intervention session (approximately 6 weeks)
2

Number of participants completing the intervention protocol

Participants completing all 6 intervention sessions, as a proportion of those randomized. Reasons for discontinuation recorded.

Time frame
Randomization through final intervention session (approximately 4 weeks)
3

Percentage of scheduled intervention sessions attended

Sessions attended as a proportion of sessions scheduled, across all randomized participants.

Time frame
Intervention period (approximately 3 weeks)
4

Adherence to the intervention protocol

Proportion of prescribed conditioning stimulations completed per session (225 across 3 blocks of 75), and sessions completed without protocol deviation.

Time frame
Intervention period (approximately 3 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in flexor withdrawal reflex amplitude

Rectified EMG reflex amplitude during conditioning blocks expressed relative to the within-session 25-stimulation baseline, and change across the 6 sessions.

Time frame
Week 1 through Week 3
2

Pain severity

Knee pain rated on a visual analog scale.

Time frame
Week 1, Week 3, and Week 5
3

Pressure pain threshold

Algometry at the patellae and wrist.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 1), then Week 1 through Week 3
4

Temporal summation of pain

Change in pain rating across repeated weighted pinprick stimuli.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 1)

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Northeastern University

Lead sponsor

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: