Neuronal Activation Accuracy in Closed-loop Spinal Cord Stimulation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorKarel Hanssens

About this trial

Observational, prospective, single-center to assess neuronal activation accuracy and stimulation sensation in patients with closed-loop spinal cord stimulation therapy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Subject is deemed a suitable candidate for SCS trial and permanent implant and has been routinely scheduled to undergo an SCS trial phase with the Evoke SCS System.

Subject has a minimum of pain intensity of 5/10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) at baseline

Subject is ≥ 18 years old.

Subject is not pregnant or nursing.

Disqualifiers

Subject currently has an active implantable device including pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug delivery system.

Subject is incapable of understanding or responding to the study questionnaires.

Subject is incapable of understanding or operating the patient programmer handset.

Trial population

Subjects suffering from chronic pain and are eligible for SCS trial and permanent implant.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ECAP-controlled, closed-loop SCS

    Device

    Spinal cord stimulation that measures and records evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) and automatically adjusts the stimulation current to maintain a consistent ECAP amplitude

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Number of participants with change in stimulation sensation

Stimulation sensation will be characterized by study participants as better, worse or same for 5 different closed-loop sensitivity settings.

Time frame
6-months

Secondary outcomes

1

NRS

The numeric rating scale (NRS) is a pain screening tool. It is used to assess pain severity at that moment in time using a 0-10 scale. Zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable".

Time frame
Baseline, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months post-implant
2

Number of participants with reduced pain distribution

Pain distribution will be assessed by showing a visual representation of the body that enables participants to indicate the locations of their pain.

Time frame
Baseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-implant
3

Paraesthesia mapping

Paraesthesia mapping will be assessed by showing a visual representation of the body that enables participants to indicate the locations where they feel paraesthesia.

Time frame
3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-implant

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Karel Hanssens

Lead sponsor

AZ Delta

Sponsor institution