NHRI Intelligent Voice Interactive Platform for High-Quality Community Living Among Older Adults

ConditionsAgingBehavior
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age55-100
SponsorNational Health Research Institutes, Taiwan

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of an integrated smart voice platform on quality of life and local healthy aging among community-dwelling older adults in both urban and rural areas. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the smart voice platform, integrating healthcare, long-term care, and health promotion resources, improve the community life quality of elderly participants?

Participants will:

Receive access to and training on an existing smart voice platform system that connects healthcare, long-term care, and local cross-domain resources (businesses, NPOs, and NGOs).

Complete assessments evaluating their quality of life, digital capability, and healthy aging outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Cognitively intact older adults, or those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Able to independently use a smartphone and engage in voice-based interactive question-and-answer sessions.

Disqualifiers

Individuals diagnosed with dementia who do not own or have access to a smartphone.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • NHRI Smart Voice Interaction Platform

    Behavioral

    The NHRI- Smart Voice Interaction Platform is an AI-driven, voice-interactive behavioral care platform customized for older adults to address health information-seeking barriers and enhance self-management. It features five core components: 1. Interactive Voice Consultation: Natural-language voice Q\&A providing reliable health guidance (chronic diseases, nutrition, pain care, mental wellbeing) and anti-fraud counseling. 2. Bimodal Digital Newsletters: Health and wellness bulletins accessible via on-screen reading or on-demand spoken audio read-aloud. 3. Self-Monitoring: Digital tracking for uploading physiological metrics (blood pressure, blood glucose) to foster daily self-care. 4. Community Resource Navigation: Directory enabling users to search for nearby medical services, long-term care, and living essentials. 5. Technical Support: Routine assistance by the NHRI team to maintain digital engagement.

Treatment groups

300 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: NHRI Smart Voice Interaction PlatformExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36 v1) Subscale Scores (score)

Health-related quality of life is assessed using the SF-36 Taiwan Version, evaluating 8 subscales: Physical Functioning (PF, 10 items, raw 10-30), Role-Physical (RP, 4 items, raw 4-8), Bodily Pain (BP, 2 items, raw 2-12), General Health (GH, 5 items, raw 5-25), Vitality (VT, 4 items, raw 4-24), Social Functioning (SF, 2 items, raw 2-10), Role-Emotional (RE, 3 items, raw 3-6), and Mental Health (MH, 5 items, raw 5-30). Per standard Taiwanese scoring guidelines, raw scores are linearly transformed into an identical 0 to 100 standardized scale: \[(raw score - min score) / score range\] \* 100. The outcome reports changes in each standardized subscale score (Unit of Measure: points, range 0-100), where higher scores indicate superior functional health. Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months
2

Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) Total Score (score)

Self-care and daily health practices are assessed using the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II, Chinese version). The instrument evaluates 52 items across six dimensions: health responsibility, physical activity, nutrition, spiritual growth, interpersonal relations, and stress management, each rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = "never" to 4 = "routinely"). The outcome is reported as the overall mean composite score across all items (Unit of Measure: score on a scale of 1.0 to 4.0), where higher scores indicate more frequent adoption of health-promoting self-management behaviors. Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months
3

30-Second Arm Curl Test (counts)

Upper-body muscular strength and endurance are assessed using the 30-Second Arm Curl Test from the Senior Fitness Test protocol. Participants sit upright and complete as many biceps curls as possible within 30 seconds using their dominant hand (5-pound dumbbell for females, 8-pound for males). The outcome is reported as the total count of correctly completed repetitions (Unit of Measure: repetitions). For clinical interpretation, repetition counts are categorized against sex- and age-specific normative tiers (Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor). Higher counts indicate superior functional muscle strength. Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months
4

4-Meter Walk Test Functional Mobility (category)

Mobility and gait function are assessed using the 4-Meter Walk Test adapted from the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) protocol. Participants walk a 4-meter course at their usual, comfortable pace. Walk performance is converted into a 4-point ordinal category reflecting functional mobility tiers: 3 = \<3.5 seconds (fast gait speed, superior mobility), 2 = 3.5-4.9 seconds, 1 = 5.0-8.0 seconds, and 0 = \>8.0 seconds (slow gait speed, mobility impairment). The outcome is reported as the change in this single ordinal category score (Unit of Measure: category on a scale of 0 to 3), where higher scores indicate superior functional mobility. Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Total Score (score)

Participants' acceptance of the smart voice platform is evaluated using an adapted 11-item Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree"). The outcome is reported as the total sum score across all 11 items (Unit of Measure: points, range 11 to 77), evaluating perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention to use the platform. Higher scores represent greater technology acceptance. Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months
2

System Usability Scale (SUS) (score)

Platform usability and user satisfaction are evaluated using the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree"). Raw item scores are converted according to the standard Brooke scoring algorithm into a composite score from 0 to 100 (Unit of Measure: points, range 0 to 100). Higher scores indicate superior platform usability (scores \>=68 represent acceptable usability). Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months

Other outcomes

1

Digital Service Utilization (counts)

Adoption of daily digital services is assessed across 7 domains: online information search, mobile payments, online finance/stocks, social messaging, digital healthcare/telehealth, online entertainment, and digital learning. Each domain is scored dichotomously (0 = No, 1 = Yes). The outcome is reported as the total count of regularly utilized digital services (Unit of Measure: counts, range 0 to 7). Higher counts indicate broader digital autonomy in community living. Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months
2

Perceived Informal Social Support Composite Score (score)

Perceived informal emotional and social support is assessed through 3 core items: willingness of others to listen (1-5), perceived care from family/friends (1-5), and satisfaction with emotional support received (1-5). The outcome is reported as the mean composite score across the three items (Unit of Measure: score on a scale of 1.0 to 5.0). Higher scores indicate stronger perceived informal social support. Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months
3

Educational Attainment Level (category)

Assessed using the formal educational attainment classification. Educational levels are categorized as: 1 = Elementary school or below (≦6 years), 2 = Junior high school (7-9 years), 3 = Senior high/vocational school (10-12 years), 4 = Junior college, 5 = University (bachelor's degree), and 6 = Master's degree or above. The outcome is measured by the formal educational level (categorical tier 1 to 6). Higher scores represent higher educational attainment and formal cognitive reserve.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months
4

Self-Reported Chronic Medical Conditions (counts)

Multimorbidity burden is assessed using a standardized checklist of 13 physician-diagnosed chronic conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, stroke, arthritis). Each condition is scored dichotomously (0 = No, 1 = Yes). The outcome is reported as the total count of co-existing chronic conditions (Unit of Measure: counts, range 0 to 13). Changes from baseline to 6 months are evaluated.

Time frame
Baseline, 6 months

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.