No Sedation Versus Daily Interruption of Sedation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Mechanically Ventilated Patients- A Prospective Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorBenha University

About this trial

this study is to compare no-sedation versus daily interruption of sedation (DIS) in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients receiving mechanical ventilation upon the ventilator-free days.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients of both sex aged 18 years or older

The study will include 60 patients divided into 2 equal groups

Invasive mechanical ventilation

Patients with COPD patients (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC< 70, and under follow through the department outpatient clinic) exacerbation admitted to the ICU and required invasive mechanical ventilation were recruited.

Disqualifiers

renal or hepatic impairment

proven or suspected psychiatric or neurological impairment

pregnancy

Trial population

The study will include 60 patients divided into 2 equal groups

Trial design

Design model

Case-control

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • daily Interruption of Sedation

    Behavioral

    The patients will be managed by DIS. Richmond agitation and sedation score (RASS) will be used for monitoring the depth of sedation

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: The patients will be managed by DIS. Richmond agitation and sedation score (RASS) will be used for m1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Ventilator-free days

Ventilator-free days (Number of days from day-1 to day-28) on which the patient did not need assistance to his breathe.

Time frame
from day-1 to day-28)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.