About this trial
This study aimed at comparing the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), readmission rates, postoperative hospitalization days, duration of bearing the stoma (months), hospitalization costs, the number of hospitalizations with ghost ileostomy group versus no ileostomy group after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Pathologically confirmed rectal cancer.
age ≥18 years and ≤80 years.
intraoperative ghost ileostomy or no stoma was performed.
Disqualifiers
ASA score >3.
Patients with coexisting complete intestinal obstruction.
History of long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs or glucocorticoids.
Combined severe cardiac disease: with congestive heart failure or NYHA cardiac function ≥ grade 2.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Ghost ileostomy
Procedure/SurgeryLaparoscopic or robotic surgery with ghost ileostomy
No ileostomy
Procedure/SurgeryLaparoscopic or robotic surgery with no ileostomy
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Calculation postoperative of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for each patient
The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)summarises all postoperative complications based on the established Clavien-Dindo classification (ranging from mild complications not leading to a deviation from the normal clinical course (grade I) up to postoperative death (grade V)) at an individual patient level according to their grade of severity.
Secondary outcomes
Postoperative hospitalization days
If the ghost ileostomy group required bed rest or a second surgery for ileostomy due to complications or no stoma group required a second surgery due to complications, the number of days of hospitalization due to complications and/or reoperation since total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer was recorded.
Readmission rates
Patients in the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the number of hospitalizations after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. If the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications, record the number of hospitalizations due to complications and/or reoperation since the data of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
The number of hospitalizations
Patients in the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups who did not have a second surgery due to complications recorded the number of hospitalizations after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. If the ghost ileostomy and no stoma groups required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications, record the number of hospitalizations due to complications and/or reoperation since the data of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
First hospitalization costs
Patient hospitalization costs for total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer.
Other outcomes
Whether patients undergo terminal ostomy after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Hartmann's procedure or for example, abdominoperineal extirpation
The number of participants with ghost ileostomy converted to diverting ileostomy
The ghost stoma required bedside or secondary surgery for diverting ileostomy due to complications.
The number of patients who required secondary abdominal surgery under general anesthesia due to complications
Patient undergoes second abdominal surgery for complications after first surgery
Ghost ileostomy remove time
Duration of days from the date of total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer to ghost stoma removed.
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
fan li
Lead sponsor
Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University
Sponsor institution
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: