About this trial
This project is randomized controlled trial which will explore the effect of pairing repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) with Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) Cycling on lower extremity function in people with incomplete spinal cord injury and compare the effects to each one of these interventions alone.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
adult
having motor incomplete SCI with level C or D on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) with the lesion at any level of the cord resulting from either traumatic or non-traumatic etiology who are at least one-year post-injury.
having non-progressive SCI
being able to walk independently for 10 meters without help from another person
Disqualifiers
other orthopedic or neurological implications that affect the lower extremity function
contraindications to FES (e.g., implanted electronic devices, unhealed bone fractures, sever contractures, extreme osteoporosis or osteoarthritis)
contraindications to rTMS (e.g., metal implants, history of seizure, cochlear implants)
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
DevicerTMS will be applied to primary motor cortex of the brain.
functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling
DeviceFES will be applied to muscles associated in cycling: quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, soleus.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Time taken to complete the recruitment of 12 participants
This outcome will be evaluated through descriptive data. This outcome will be analyzed to evaluate the feasibility of the protocol.
Proportion of participants recruited from the total number screened
This outcome will be evaluated through descriptive data. This outcome will be analyzed to evaluate the feasibility of the protocol.
Number of sessions attended by each participant
This outcome will be evaluated through descriptive data. This outcome will be analyzed to evaluate the tolerability of the protocol.
Number of dropouts in each group
This outcome will be evaluated through descriptive data. This outcome will be analyzed to evaluate the tolerability of the protocol.
Secondary outcomes
Walking speed
This instrumental outcome is collected using a pressure sensor gait mat.
Step length
This instrumental outcome is collected using a pressure sensor gait mat.
Step width
This instrumental outcome is collected using a pressure sensor gait mat.
Cadence
This instrumental outcome is collected using a pressure sensor gait mat.
Other outcomes
Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale
Evaluation of the participants' impact will be collected through a GRC questionnaire in each assessment session. Global Rating Scale will ask participants to rate their walking abilities and overall recovery of the lower limb function from the time that they began the treatment until now. This scale is rated from -7 to 7 as follows: * 7: A very great deal worse * 6: A great deal worse * 5: Quite a bit worse * 4: Moderately worse * 3: Somewhat worse * 2: A little bit worse * 1: A tiny bit worse (almost the same) 0: About the same * 1: A tiny bit better (almost the same) * 2: A little bit better * 3: Somewhat better * 4: Moderately better * 5: Quite a bit better * 6: A great deal better * 7: A very great deal better Higher scores in this outcome mean better results.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.