About this trial
The purpose of the study is to investigate novel electroretinography (ERG) devices in the detection of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy. Two devices (the RETEval full-field and flicker ERG and UTAS multifocal ERG) will be evaluated in this study, comparing device outputs to standard of care screening tests, in groups of participants characterised by presence or absence of hydroxychloroquine-related retinopathy.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age ≥18 years
No prior HCQ exposure
Disqualifiers
Cataract grade ≥3 of any subtype
Recent cataract surgery within 4 weeks of recruitment
Significant media opacity or corneal disease including, but not limited to, corneal oedema, corneal scarring, keratoconus, previous corneal transplants, severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca (requiring the use of topical serum, immunosuppressive or analogous therapy, or procedural treatment).
Significant macular co-pathology including, but not limited to, macular degeneration, macular scarring, cystic macular oedema (for any reason), staphyloma.
Trial population
Age- and sex-matched control group (n=35) On hydroxychloroquine without retinopathy (n=35) On hydroxychloroquine with possible retinopathy (n=35) On hydroxychloroquine with definite retinopathy (n=35)
Trial design
Other
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Hand-Held Full-Field Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
Diagnostic testRETEval Complete hand-held electroretinogram
Trolley-Mounted Multifocal Skin-Electrode Electroretinography (Device to be evaluated)
Diagnostic testUTAS multifocal electroretinogram
Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic testHeidelberg Engineering Spectralis Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (macular structural scan)
Macular Autofluorescence (Standard of Care test)
Diagnostic testHeidelberg Engineering Spectralis Autofluorescence imaging (macular structural image)
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
The sensitivity and specificity of both devices to discriminate between NO, POSSIBLE and DEFINITE hydroxychloroquine retinopathy compared to standard screening tests
Primary Outcome
Secondary outcomes
To compare the sensitivity and specificity of undilated versus dilated testing with the multifocal ERG device, for all categories of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy
Secondary Outcome
To determine the patient acceptability of both devices evaluated using standardised, study-specific questionnaires
Feasibility Outcome
To determine the proportion and recruitment rate of patients in each category of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy who consent to join this study.
Feasibility Outcome
Other outcomes
To determine which ERG waveform features (such as implicit time or amplitude) from both devices best discriminate participants with NO hydroxychloroquine retinopathy from those with POSSIBLE and DEFINITE hydroxychloroquine retinopathy
Exploratory Outcome
To determine if both device waveforms correlate with standard mfERG waveforms in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine
Exploratory Outcome
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Lead sponsor
LUPUS UK
Collaborator
King's College Hospital Charity
Collaborator