Open and Closed Loop DTM SCS in Patients With PSPS Type 2: ENDLESS Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

About this trial

Evaluation of the effectiveness of differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation for treatment of Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II (PSPS-T2). Identification of clinical effective parameters concerning frequency, pulse duration, amplitude and battery consumption/recharge frequency and safety evaluation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

having chronic pain as a result of PSPS-T2 that exists for at least 6 months with at least moderate pain intensity (4 or higher measured on numeric rating scale (NRS) or 31mm or higher measured on visual analogue scale (VAS) for the dominant pain location.

being offered treatment with DTM SCS

being at least 18 years old

Disqualifiers

Expected inability of patients to properly operate the SCS system

History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetic neuropathy

Active malignancy

Addiction to drugs and/or alcohol (more than 5 units /day)

Trial population

Patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2), who will receive treatment with differential target multiplexed (DTM) SCS.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Spinal Cord Stimulation

    Device

    Differential target multiplexed stimulation

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Overall pain intensity

The primary effectiveness outcome measure is pain intensity measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain) in electronic format. Two scales will be presented for low back/neck pain and for leg/arm pain. Ecological momentary Assessment (EMA) will be used to collect pain intensity scores for VAS, whereby pain intensity is measured for multiple times per day for 1 week to reveal patterns of transient or fluctuating symptoms in the environment and context of the patients' lives, without a recall bias.

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Pain intensity for the lower back and leg pain or neck and arm pain component

Pain intensity for the lower back and leg pain or neck and arm pain component will be assessed separately with the Numeric Rating Scale (0 to 10). Pain intensity for the last 7 days will be assessed in electronic format, with and without medication use.

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
2

Medication use

Open question regarding the use of medication (collected through ecological momentary assessment for 1 week).

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
3

Negative affect

Questions on a 9-point scale for negative affects, evaluated through ecological momentary assessment for 7 days.

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months
4

Functional disability

The Oswestry disability index (ODI; 0 to 100) or Neck disability index (NDI; 0 to 100) is used to measure functional disability due to abnormalities of the spine

Time frame
The change between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after DTM stimulation, 6 months and 12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.