Optimisation of Decision Making for Defibrillator Implantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age16+
SponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

About this trial

The main objective of the study is to improve implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation decision-making processing relevance by developing a new prediction model of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), including newly identified potential biomarkers by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genetics, through a prospective nationwide study, multivariate analysis and modelling of an absolute risk.

The secondary objective is to perform a medico-economic analysis of ICD implantation in order to define an optimal rule for ICD implantation in patients with HCM, taking into account the benefits of ICD, adverse effects of ICD and associated costs (cost of quality adjusted life years saved).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient with a diagnosis of HCM based on conventional criteria (left ventricle wall thickness ≥ 15 mm in adult index or ≥ 13 mm in adult relatives) in the absence of abnormal loading conditions

Aged ≥ 16 years

Patient without or with a defibrillator (in this latter case it should have been implanted for primary prevention, not for secondary prevention)

Affiliation to a social security insurance

Disqualifiers

Specific etiologies such as amyloidosis

Patients with ICD as secondary prevention (after aborted SCD or sustained ventricular arrhythmia)

Trial population

* Inclusion of adults with HCM, as well as teenagers 16 or older since SCD occurs frequently in this age group * Necessary not to include specific etiologies such as amyloidosis because of a known different prognosis and natural history * Necessary not to include patients with ICD as secondary prevention because of a different prognosis and a worldwide consensus on the need for ICD implantation in this case * Necessary to include all cases whatever their date of diagnosis as the predictive modelling (primary objective) targets the actual population being followed up in real life, and will ultimately be applied on this population

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

Not listed

Trial groups

No trial groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Improvement of the ability to predict major clinical events: C-index comparisons

Comparisons of the C-index obtained between with the new score and with the different existing scores or algorithms of actual processing used for ICD decision-making. C-index is a discrimination index, which will be determined after multivariate analyses and score modeling, in the case of the new score. This evaluate of the improvement of the ability to predict major clinical events during follow-up will toward to development of a new prediction model in patients with HCM in responding the main objective of the study. Data will be collected are: (composite end point): SCD, aborted sudden death, appropriate therapy of ICD that is a physiological equivalent of SCD.

Time frame
throughout of the study, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

1

Cost-effectiveness study

To determine incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ICD decision, in order to assess the economic impact of defibrillator implantation as a function of the chosen rule for device implantation. Data will be collected are: direct costs (health insurance tariffs) of defibrillators, cost of their maintenance and for management of side effects, for the treatment of sudden death recovered, the medical transport, hospitalizations and for cardiology acts.

Time frame
throughout of the study, an average of 1 year
2

Cost-utility analysis

To determine incremental cost-utility ratio of ICD decision, in order to assess the economic impact of defibrillator implantation as a function of the chosen rule for device implantation. Data will be collected are: direct costs (health insurance tariffs) of defibrillators, cost of their maintenance and for management of side effects, for the treatment of sudden death recovered, the medical transport, hospitalizations and for cardiology acts.

Time frame
throughout of the study, an average of 1 year
3

Quality Adjusted Life Years

QALYs calculated using EQ-5d Index: "EQ5D-5L QoL questionnaire", a questionnaire established by EuroQol Group in 5 dimensions with 5 levers.

Time frame
at baseline and at 6-year follow-up
4

Improvement of the ability to predict major clinical events: C-index comparisons

Comparison of the C-index obtained between the new score developed for the primary objective and the C-index obtained when the following additional covariates are added to the multivariate predictive model: gender, maximum left ventricle wall thickness obtained by MRI, left atrial volume on echocardiography, left ventricle strain on echocardiography.

Time frame
at baseline

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.