Optimization of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Liberal Use of Intracoronary Imaging Versus Contemporary Practice

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorCathreine BV

About this trial

Coronary artery disease remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide and is commonly treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Typically, PCI is guided by invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, ICA has inherent limitations in accurately assessing vessel dimensions, calcium burden, circumferential tissue and whether a stent has achieved full expansion. Therefore ICA alone is insufficient for guiding stent optimization, especially in complex lesions which are most vulnerable to long-term stent failure. To overcome the limitations of ICA, intracoronary imaging can be used to guide and optimize PCI. The advantages of intracoronary imaging include obtaining larger lumen areas, better stent expansion and strut apposition, full lesion stent coverage and identifying stent complications. Multiple randomized studies have shown that these advantages translate into a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in complex PCI. Consequently, the recommendation for intracoronary imaging has been upgraded in the most recent guidelines.

Despite robust evidence supporting its benefits, intracoronary imaging remains relatively underused in real-world practice and in the Netherlands it is only used in 7% of complex PCI procedures. This underutilization may be attributed to several factors, including operator and hospital-dependent issues such as lack of experience, reluctance to spend additional time on intracoronary imaging and concerns about its cost-effectiveness. Therefore, initiating an implementation project to incorporate intracoronary imaging into routine use in the catheterization lab during complex PCI would be highly valuable. Such a project could make imaging-guided PCI the standard of care in complex PCI. Additionally, it could evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine intracoronary imaging during complex PCI.

For this reason we designed the OPTIMIZE-PCI II, a national registry-based quality improvement project. This project is aimed at implementing a liberal intracoronary imaging-guided strategy for complex PCI across multiple centres in the Netherlands, with data extraction from the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) database. The objective of the OPTIMIZE-PCI II is to establish a routine use of intracoronary imaging in complex PCI, to determine if this approach reduces adverse cardiac events in real-world practice, and evaluate its cost-effectiveness.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

All patients above the age of 18, included in the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) quality database after receiving PCI in complex coronary lesions, will be included in the analyses of this project.

Left main: A stenosis of >50% and/or a FFR ≤ 0.80 and iFR ≤ 0.89 in the left main.

Severely calcified lesion: Defined as use of calcium modification therapy (e.g. cutting balloon, scoring balloon, rotablation, orbital atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy).

TIMI flow 0

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

The population exists of patients registered in our national PCI registration of the Netherlands Heart Registration after receiving complex PCI. All indications are included (ACS and non-ACS, OHCA, cardiogenic shock).

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Liberal use of intracoronary imaging during complex PCI

    Behavioral

    A new protocol regarding use of intracoronary imaging will be implemented in multiple PCI centers in the Netherlands. Main goal of this protocol will be to increase the use of imaging in complex PCI in the Netherlands. Moreover operators will be trained according to the new protocol and on site training will be organized to improve the skills in using imaging during complex PCI.Operators are requested to use of intracoronary imaging preferentially in all complex coronary lesions, but at least increase their use with at least 50% and minimum of 25% of the cases. Throughout the second phase, individual participating operators will receive personalized feedback on their use of intracoronary imaging at multiple intervals. Based on this result, the implementation process will be refined as necessary. These intermediate measurements will also be shared with all participating centres anonymous.

Treatment groups

11,092 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Pre-implementation cohort0 interventions
Group B: Post-implementation cohort1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Occurrence of target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality

The primary composite end point of major adverse cardiac events is the occurrence of target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality.

Time frame
1 year

Secondary outcomes

1

Occurrence of all cause mortality

all cause mortality, confirmed by verifying the vital status of a patient in the Personal Records Database.

Time frame
30 days, 1 year
2

Occurrence of target vessel revascularization

Target vessel revascularization, defined as a revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the same vessel(s) that had been treated at the index procedure, excluding staged procedures.

Time frame
30 days and 1 year
3

Occurrence of myocardial infarction

Myocardial infarction, defined as an increase and/or decrease in one or more cardiac biomarkers by at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper limit where at least one of the following symptoms is present: 1) symptoms appropriate to ischemia, 2) new significant ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities or bundle branch block, 3) development of pathological Q-waves on the electrocardiogram (ECG), 4) imaging demonstrated new loss of viable myocardial tissue or new wall motion abnormalities, 5) identification of intracoronary thrombus on angiography or autopsy.

Time frame
30 days 1 year
4

Occurrence of stent thrombosis

Defined as angiographically or pathologically confirmed thrombus within the stent or within 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent, occurring within 1 year, with at least one of the following criteria present within 48 hours: Acute onset of ischemic symptoms at rest New ischemic ECG changes suggestive of acute ischemia Characteristic rise or fall in cardiac biomarkers Occlusive thrombus (TIMI flow grade 0 or 1) Non-occlusive, visibly present thrombus (angiographically confirmed)

Time frame
30 days, 1 year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Cathreine BV

Lead sponsor

Philips Healthcare

Collaborator

Boston Scientific Corporation

Collaborator

Abbott Medical Devices

Collaborator

Salveo Diagnostics

Collaborator