About this trial
In critical care, hemodynamic instability often requires volume expansion to restore tissue perfusion, increasing fluid balance and TBW, factors associated with higher mortality. Excess fluid leads to organ dysfunction due to venous congestion, making fluid removal crucial. When diuretics fail, RRT, typically through continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), is recommended. However, prescribing the correct level of UF is challenging; insufficient UF can worsen edema, while excessive UF risks hemodynamic instability. This pilot, single-center, prospective, interventional, randomized, controlled, open-label study includes two parallel groups: a standard group with UF prescribed by the physician based on clinical and hemodynamic status and an experimental group with UF guided by the extracellular to total body water (ECW/TBWat) ratio measured by BIA. The aim is to determine if ECW/TBW-guided UF improves fluid and TBW reduction over a 72-hour RRT period.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age > 18 years
The patient was hospitalized in the intensive care unit of Amiens-Picardie University Hospital.
Patient with an increase in fluid balance (TBW > 5%)
Patient receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) on a PrismaFlexR or PrisMaxR machine, initiated due to oliguria, potassium level > 6.5 mmol/L, urea level > 25 mmol/L, or creatinine > 300 µmol/L and severe metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.2).
Disqualifiers
Invalid BIA measurements
Internal device powered by an electrical current (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, neurostimulator)
Cardiac arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter) present at the inclusion
Chronic dialysis patient
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
Procedure/SurgeryThe patient is included in the study once they meet the eligibility criteria and as soon as the responsible physician has prescribed RRT according to the department's protocol. Randomization will be performed, and the patient will be assigned to either the standard or experimental groups.
Free UF Prescription
Other interventionThe UF (ml/h) is prescribed by the responsible physician based on the patient's clinical, congestive, and hemodynamic status. The physician can implement the UF whenever necessary based on the patient's hemodynamic condition.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
comparison of TBW between both groups
To assess the impact of UF prescription guided by the ECW/TBWat ratio on weight loss, a comparison of TBW (∆TBW) between the two groups will be conducted. The ∆TBW is the difference between the initial TBW at H0 and the TBW at H72.
Secondary outcomes
Variation of cumulative net UF
The net UF is the difference between the fluids removed by RRT and the replacement fluids infused before and after the RRT filter. The cumulative net UF is the UF measured from H0 to H72. The volume of UF and infused replacement fluid will be calculated using data extracted from the memory card of the RRT machine.
Measurement of the net UF rate
Measurement of the net UF rate (ml/kg/h): The net UF rate is calculated as follows: cumulative net UF / (TBW at H0) x effective treatment duration during the 72 hours of the study. The treatment duration will be measured using data extracted from the memory card of the RRT machine.
Measurement of the ECW/TBWATratio and its association with the VeXUS score
Measurement of the ECW/TBWATratio and its association with the VeXUS score at H0 . The VeXUS score is an echocardiographic score (ranging from 0 to 3) used to analyze venous congestion at the cardiac, renal, and hepatic levels.
Measurement of the ECW/TBWATratio and its association with the VeXUS score
Measurement of the ECW/TBWATratio and its association with the VeXUS score at H72 . The VeXUS score is an echocardiographic score (ranging from 0 to 3) used to analyze venous congestion at the cardiac, renal, and hepatic levels.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.