ORIGIN® vs. VANGUARD® PS Observational Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSymbios Orthopedie SA

About this trial

The study objective is to assess patient satisfaction after the surgery with a patient match CE marked implant (ORIGIN®) versus off-the-shelf (VANGUARD PS) device, and to document the clinical and device performance outcomes of the ORIGIN System used in routine hospital practice in a large patient cohort treatment of total knee arthroplasty.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

None

Trial population

Non-inflammatory degenerative and inflammatory knee joint disease

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • ORIGIN PS System

    Device

    70 surgeries with the ORIGIN PS System

  • VANGUARD PS System

    Device

    70 surgeries with the VANGUARD System

Treatment groups

140 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Origine1 intervention
Group B: Vanguard1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Forgotten Joint Score

12 questions and measure the ability of the patient to forget their operated knee after the surgery.

Time frame
Preoperative, 1 year, and 2 years visits
2

The Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale

Patients' overall satisfaction with surgery, the extent of pain relief, the ability to perform home or yard work, and the ability to perform recreational activities.

Time frame
Preoperative, 1 year, and 2 years visits

Secondary outcomes

1

Oxford Knee Score (OKS)

Patient reported scores This Quality of Life score was developed in 1998 and validated to measure pain and function after total knee replacement. It consists of 12 questions about pain, function and mobility of the knee joint. Each question scores from 1 to 5 (1 the best and 5 the worst) and the sum of all the scores is deducted from 60 points. The best total is 48 points and the worst is 0.

Time frame
Preoperative, 1 year, and 2 years visits
2

EQ-5D-5L

Patient reported scores. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can image' and 'The worst health you can image'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.

Time frame
Preoperative, 1 year, and 2 years visits
3

Knee Society clinical rating system (KSS) Objective Knee Indicators

Surgeon reported score. It consists of 4 questions regarding the alignment and mobility of the knee joint: "Alignment" has a maximum of 25 points and is determined on a weight-bearing AP radiograph measuring the femoral-tibial (Anatomic) axis. "Instability" allows a maximum of 25 points for a knee that is stable in the coronal and saggital axis. "Joint Motion" allows one point for each 5° of joint motion. Unlike the old scoring system that allowed a maximum of 25 points the new system allows greater than 25 points for patients with greater than 125° of motion. There are deductions for flexion contracture and extension lag. The presence of recurvatum is not specifically addressed however patients with recurvatum will have significant ligament laxity in other planes that is captured in the "Instability" category of the objective score. Maximum allowable points 25+

Time frame
Preoperative, 1 year, and 2 years visits
4

Single Leg Stance test

Surgeon reported score. It is used to assess static postural and balance control. It is a balance assessement that is widely used in clinical settings to monitor neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. It measures the duration of exercices with eyes opened and closed in seconds.

Time frame
Preoperative, 1 year, and 2 years visits

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.