Health TrialsbyHealthPanel

Orotracheal Intubation in Newborns: Videolaryngoscopy Vs Direct Laryngoscopy

ConditionThe Time Taken for Successful Tracheal Intubation in Each Technique
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age1-30
SponsorTunis University

About this trial

The children were randomized into two groups to receive orotracheal intubation after anesthetic induction with neuromuscular blockade, either by direct laryngoscopy (DL, DL group) or by C-MAC video laryngoscopy (VL group)

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

newborns requiring orotracheal intubation for surgery or mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit

Disqualifiers

age> 01 month

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Video Laryngoscopy

    Device

    orotracheal intubation by C-Mac ( Video laryngoscopy)

  • Direct Laryngoscopy

    Device

    Orotracheal intubation using Direct Laryngoscopy

Treatment groups

115 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Video laryngoscopyOther 1 intervention
Group B: Direct laryngoscopyOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

time taken for successful tracheal intubation

Time frame
during intubation

Secondary outcomes

1

the need for additional device

Time frame
during intubation
2

the number of attempts

Time frame
during intubation
3

Complications during intubation

complications such as desaturation and selective intubation.

Time frame
during intubation

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Tunis University

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Apply now