About this trial
In this randomized controlled trial, we will evaluate if bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BEEP) is associated with better urinary voiding outcome than transurethral resection (TURP) in men with enlarged prostate referred to surgery. In addition we will investigate the association between symptom relief and the amount of removed tissue and if patients experience differ between the two methods. Finally, we will assess cost-effectiveness of BEEP compared to TURP. The main outcome for comparison of the two surgical methods is International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) assessed at 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome to assess patient experience is measured with the questionnaire Nordic Patients Experience Questionnaire (NORPEQ). Cost-effectiveness will be measured with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
None
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Transurethral resection of the prostate.
Procedure/SurgeryThe study compares two surgical treatments for voiding problems in men with enlarged prostate.
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate
Procedure/SurgeryMen with intermediate sized prostate and voiding problems are randomized to two different treatment modalities.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
The primary outcome is IPPS score. IPSS is recommended by the European Association of Urology to evaluate LUTS in men.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.