Outcomes of Ridge Splitting Versus Sausage Technique

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-75
SponsorBeni-Suef University

About this trial

The current study aims to increase the width of the alveolar bone in defective mandibular ridge with simultaneous implant placement and enhance the implant stability

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with deficient bone volume between (2 : 3.5 ) mm

Patients must have installed functional implant for no less than 3 months- enough time to allow for bone augmentation changes.

Patients with no defect in the gingival tissues.

Patients with un-remarkable medical compromising conditions

Disqualifiers

Patients with compromising medical condition.

Patients with severe bone resorption.

Patients with D1 or D2 bone.

Bone height <10mm

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ridge split

    Procedure/Surgery

    The alveolar ridge splitting technique was introduced by Simion in 1992 as a successful bone grafting technique to augment the horizontally deficient alveolar ridge with immediate implant placement

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Ridge splitActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Sausage techinqueActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Evaluation of bone width

Cone beam CT used to asses bone density

Time frame
(4-6) months
2

Implant primary stability

Osstel device used to asses the stability from 1 to 100

Time frame
(4-6 )months

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.