About this trial
This prospective, randomized controlled trial evaluates the clinical efficacy of autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Gentamicin-Loaded PRF as regenerative and antimicrobial biological adjuncts in primary palatoplasty. A total of 90 pediatric and adolescent patients with unilateral and bilateral complete and incomplete cleft palates will be assigned across three parallel treatment arms: standard palatoplasty alone (control), palatoplasty augmented with standard PRF, and palatoplasty augmented with gentamicin-loaded PRF. The primary objective is to compare quantitative primary mucosal healing scores, wound dehiscence rates, and the incidence of postoperative oronasal fistula formation to determine whether local gentamicin-PRF delivery significantly improves soft-tissue healing and reduces surgical breakdown
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients presenting with non-syndromic complete or incomplete unilateral or bilateral cleft palate.
Scheduled for primary palatoplasty.
Age within the specified study range.
Informed consent signed by parents or legal guardians.
Disqualifiers
Patients with associated syndromic clefts or major congenital anomalies.
Previous history of palatal surgery or failed prior palatoplasty.
Bleeding disorders, active systemic infections, or contraindications to surgery or general anesthesia.
Patients lost to follow-up or incomplete records.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Standard palatoplasty ( control)
Procedure/SurgeryConventional palatoplasty performed without biological adjuncts
Platelet _ Rich Fibrin ( PRF)
Procedure/SurgeryConventional palatoplasty augmented with autologous PRF matrix
gentamicin_ loaded PRF
Combination productConventional palatoplasty augmented with gentamicin \_ loaded PRF matrix
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Wound dehiscence rate
Assessed using Wound Dehiscence Severity Score (WDSS) ranging from 0 (Intact, complete structural integrity) to 3 (Complete failure, full-thickness structural separation requiring surgical revision). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
palatal fistula formation rate
Assessed using Oronasal Fistula Severity \& Dimension Score (OFSDS) ranging from 0 (Absent, intact palate) to 3 (Major fistula, anatomical defect \> 5 mm requiring secondary surgical closure). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes
wound healing score
Assessed using Modified Primary Healing Scale (MPHS) ranging from 1 (Optimal Healing) to 4 (Severe Failure). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.