About this trial
The goal of this observational study is to ascertain the outcomes following partial breast reconstruction using chest wall perforator flaps after breast conservation surgery.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients undergoing partial breast reconstruction using CWPF for primary breast cancer
Delayed correction of breast deformity following previous BCS
Each surgeon is to have performed a minimum of 10 CWPFs
Each centre anticipates completing a minimum of 10/year
Disqualifiers
Patients undergoing volume displacement BCS
Patients undergoing mastectomy +/- immediate breast reconstruction
Trial population
Women over the age of 18 years who would have been offered all options (simple wide local excision, therapeutic mammaplasty, mastectomy with or without immediate whole breast reconstruction)
Trial design
Cohort
Prospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Not listed
Trial groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Surgical Complications
Outcomes: • Rates of complications (e.g., Haematoma, Seroma, Infection, Delayed Wound healing, Fat necrosis, Flap loss, etc). Measures: • Complication rates stratified by severity (e.g., Clavien-Dindo classification).
Secondary outcomes
Oncological Clearance
Outcomes: • Effectiveness of surgery in achieving oncological goals. Measures: • Re-operation rates: Proportion of patients requiring further surgery (re-excisions and/or mastectomy) to achieve Oncological clearance.
Revisional surgery
Outcomes: • Frequency and reasons for additional surgical procedures. Measures: • Revision rates by indication (e.g., aesthetic concerns, complication management).
Oncological: Recurrence
Outcomes: • Recurrence rates (local, regional, distant). Measures: • Time to recurrence (mean/median in months).
Oncological: Survival
Outcomes: • Survival rates Measures: • Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (mean/median in months).
Other outcomes
Patient-reported outcomes: Patient satisfaction and quality of life
Outcomes: • Patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Measures: • Measurement using a validated instrument, BREAST-Q, which converts the individual patient response items into a BREAST-Q score ranging from 0-100; a higher score means greater satisfaction of better QoL
Patient-reported outcomes: Upper extremity dysfunction
Outcomes: • Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Measures: • Measurement using a validated instrument, QuickDASH (an abbreviated version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), which converts the individual patient response items into a QuickDASH score ranging from 0 to 100; a higher score means a greater level of disability and severity.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead sponsor
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Collaborator