Patient Aid for Theory-Driven Health Communication (PATH): Translating Goal-Power Theory Into an Instrument and Generative AI Support for Palliative Care Communication

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational Taiwan University Hospital

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-supported communication tool can help improve communication between people receiving palliative care and their healthcare providers. The study will also evaluate a new questionnaire designed to measure the quality of healthcare communication.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

1. Can the new questionnaire accurately measure the quality of communication between participants and healthcare providers? 2. Does using the AI-supported communication tool, called NurseChat+, help participants feel more confident and prepared before meeting with their healthcare team? 3. Does NurseChat+ improve the quality of communication during palliative care visits?

Researchers will compare participants who use NurseChat+ together with their usual care to participants who receive usual care alone to see whether the tool improves communication outcomes.

The study will be conducted in three stages. First, researchers will develop and test a questionnaire that measures healthcare communication. Next, they will develop and refine the NurseChat+ tool. Finally, they will test the tool in adults receiving palliative care at National Taiwan University Hospital.

Participants in the final stage of the study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will use NurseChat+ before their scheduled medical visits in addition to receiving usual care, while the other group will receive usual care only. Participants will complete questionnaires about their communication experiences during the study.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18 years or older.

Diagnosed with an advanced disease requiring consultation with outpatient palliative care clinics or home care services.

Able to self-complete the study questionnaires.

Disqualifiers

Age 18 years or older.

Identified as the primary family caregiver of a patient with an advanced disease requiring palliative care.

Professional or paid caregivers.

Unable to complete the study questionnaires.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • NurseChat+

    Behavioral

    Participants will use NurseChat+, a generative AI-supported communication tool, before scheduled palliative care visits to help prepare questions and concerns for discussion with healthcare providers. The intervention is provided in addition to usual care.

Treatment groups

240 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: NurseChat+ plus usual careExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Usual CareNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change from Baseline in Communication Self-Efficacy via the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interaction Scale (PEPPI-5)

【Randomized Control Trial \& Pilot study】The PEPPI-5 is a 5-item self-report instrument used to measure a patient's perceived self-efficacy in communicating with their physician. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 5 (very confident). The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of communication self-efficacy. Outcome will be assessed as the change in scores from T0 to T1.

Time frame
Baseline (T0: within 12 hours prior to the scheduled consultation) and Post-test (T1: immediately following the medical consultation or the interaction with GenAI communication aid).
2

Quality of Health Communication via the Phase-One Developed Instrument

Evaluated using a newly developed and validated communication-quality instrument generated in Phase One of the study. This instrument is designed to comprehensively assess the specific communication quality, patterns, and clinical encounter effectiveness between healthcare providers and palliative care patients/families when aided by GenAI communication aid. The instrument is currently undergoing development and psychometric validation. The finalized total score will be structured such that higher scores will mathematically indicate a superior quality of health communication and better communication patterns.

Time frame
Post-test follow-up (T1: 24-72 hours after the consultation via telephone interview).

Secondary outcomes

1

System Usability Scale (SUS) Score of NurseChat+

【Pilot study】The UEQ contains 26 pairs of contrasting adjectives used to evaluate the user experience of NurseChat+ across 6 scales (Attractiveness, Perspicuity, Efficiency, Dependability, Stimulation, and Novelty). Each item is scored on a 7-point scale ranging from -3 (horrible/extremely bad) to +3 (excellent/extremely good). Scores above 0.8 represent a positive evaluation.

Time frame
Post-test (immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid).
2

Inventory of Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM) Score

【Pilot study】The ITAM assesses user acceptance, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use regarding the NurseChat+ GenAI system. Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1(strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agre), with higher total scores indicating a higher intention to adopt and greater acceptance of the technology.

Time frame
Post-test ( immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid)
3

Evaluation of User Experience via the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)

【Pilot study】The UEQ is a 26-item semantic differential scale used to provide a holistic assessment of the user experience of NurseChat+. It measures both pragmatic qualities (efficiency, perspicuity, dependability) and hedonic qualities (stimulation, novelty), along with overall attractiveness. Each item consists of a pair of contrasting adjectives rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7. For analysis, responses are transformed to range from -3 (horribly bad) to +3 (extremely good), where 0 represents a neutral evaluation. Higher positive values reflect a superior user experience, and scale scores above 0.8 generally indicate a positive evaluation.

Time frame
Post-test (immediately after the interaction with GenAI communication aid)
4

Improvement in Symptom Burden via the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS)

【Randomized Control Trial】The ESAS is a validated tool designed to assess 9 common symptoms in palliative care patients (pain, tiredness, drowsiness, nausea, appetite, shortness of breath, depression, anxiety, and wellbeing). Each symptom is rated on a visual analogue scale from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom). The total distress score ranges from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating a higher symptom burden.

Time frame
Baseline (T0: within 12 hours prior to the scheduled consultation) and Post-test (T1: post-consultation follow-up within 24-72 hours).

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Lead sponsor

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: