About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to improve the successful healthcare transition from pediatric to adult-focused care for childhood cancer survivors. The main questions it aims to answer are
* Receipt of the intervention (vs. standard of care control) will increase the proportion of CCS achieving transition success to adult-focused survivorship care from 50% to 70%. * Receipt of the intervention (vs. standard of care control) will significantly reduce patients' unmet HRSN. * Intervention effectiveness will be moderated by sociodemographic factors (gender, race/ethnicity, insurance status), medical risk for late effects, HRSN burden, and patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, self-efficacy).
Researchers will compare those that receive intervention versus standard of care.
Patients are randomized to either an intervention group, receiving structured PN-led sessions and tailored support for care transitions, or a control group receiving standard follow-up by a nurse case manager. High-HRSN patients in the intervention arm get monthly check-ins and coordinated handoffs to adult care providers for continuity.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
diagnosed between the ages of 0-19 years with cancer or with any condition treated with cancer-like therapy.
currently in follow up at survivorship clinic or had a survivorship launch visit during the 12 months prior to study activation.
current age 20-29 (>95% of patients will be age 20-21)
at least 5 years off treatment
Disqualifiers
do not meet transition criteria
speak a language other than English or Spanish
are significantly impaired and cannot provide informed consent.
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Navigation
BehavioralFollow Up
Control
BehavioralStandard of Care
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Proportion of participants with Transition to Adult-Focused Survivorship Care
The proportion of participants who complete a qualifying adult-focused survivorship care visit, defined as: For higher-risk survivors: a visit to the designated adult survivorship clinic For lower-risk survivors: a visit to a primary care provider that includes discussion of cancer history and/or late effects Transition success is: Self-reported by participants and Validated by study staff through contact with the receiving provider Participants without a cancer-focused component to the visit (e.g., urgent care, vaccination-only visits) will not be considered successful transitions. The outcome will be analyzed as a binary proportion (success vs. no success).
Secondary outcomes
Change in HRSN score from baseline to each follow-up time point in each study arm.
Change in the number of unmet health-related social needs assessed using the CMS Accountable Health Communities (AHC) HRSN Screening Tool, including domains such as: Housing instability, Food insecurity, Transportation barriers, Utility assistance needs, and Employment, education, mental health, and disability (supplemental items) Count 6 (all social needs endorsed) to 0 (no social needs endorsed)
Change in Global Health-Related Quality of Life Score using Likert scale
Change in patient-reported quality of life measured using the PROMIS Global Health Scale (10-item instrument), generating: Physical health summary score Mental health summary score 0 (poor self reported health) -10 (best self reported health)
Change in General Self-Efficacy using Likert scale
Change in perceived self-efficacy measured using the PROMIS General Self-Efficacy 10-item scale. Scores reflect participants' confidence in managing health and behavior and are reported as standardized scores. 1 ( Lowest Confidence ) - 5 ( Highest Confidence )
Change in mean scores for Patient-Reported Access to and Experience with Healthcare as measures by CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems)
Patient-reported measures derived from CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) assessing: Global rating of healthcare Access barriers Insurance-related difficulties Outcomes reported as mean scores Count 0 (Worst Possible Assessment) to 10 (Best Possible Assessment)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Lead sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Collaborator
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: