Patient Navigation for Improving Transition Success Among Multiply Disadvantaged Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-29
SponsorChildren's Hospital Los Angeles

About this trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to improve the successful healthcare transition from pediatric to adult-focused care for childhood cancer survivors. The main questions it aims to answer are

* Receipt of the intervention (vs. standard of care control) will increase the proportion of CCS achieving transition success to adult-focused survivorship care from 50% to 70%. * Receipt of the intervention (vs. standard of care control) will significantly reduce patients' unmet HRSN. * Intervention effectiveness will be moderated by sociodemographic factors (gender, race/ethnicity, insurance status), medical risk for late effects, HRSN burden, and patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, self-efficacy).

Researchers will compare those that receive intervention versus standard of care.

Patients are randomized to either an intervention group, receiving structured PN-led sessions and tailored support for care transitions, or a control group receiving standard follow-up by a nurse case manager. High-HRSN patients in the intervention arm get monthly check-ins and coordinated handoffs to adult care providers for continuity.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

diagnosed between the ages of 0-19 years with cancer or with any condition treated with cancer-like therapy.

currently in follow up at survivorship clinic or had a survivorship launch visit during the 12 months prior to study activation.

current age 20-29 (>95% of patients will be age 20-21)

at least 5 years off treatment

Disqualifiers

do not meet transition criteria

speak a language other than English or Spanish

are significantly impaired and cannot provide informed consent.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Navigation

    Behavioral

    Follow Up

  • Control

    Behavioral

    Standard of Care

Treatment groups

190 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: ControlActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: NavigationExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of participants with Transition to Adult-Focused Survivorship Care

The proportion of participants who complete a qualifying adult-focused survivorship care visit, defined as: For higher-risk survivors: a visit to the designated adult survivorship clinic For lower-risk survivors: a visit to a primary care provider that includes discussion of cancer history and/or late effects Transition success is: Self-reported by participants and Validated by study staff through contact with the receiving provider Participants without a cancer-focused component to the visit (e.g., urgent care, vaccination-only visits) will not be considered successful transitions. The outcome will be analyzed as a binary proportion (success vs. no success).

Time frame
Within 18 months following transition "launch" (study enrollment/baseline)

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in HRSN score from baseline to each follow-up time point in each study arm.

Change in the number of unmet health-related social needs assessed using the CMS Accountable Health Communities (AHC) HRSN Screening Tool, including domains such as: Housing instability, Food insecurity, Transportation barriers, Utility assistance needs, and Employment, education, mental health, and disability (supplemental items) Count 6 (all social needs endorsed) to 0 (no social needs endorsed)

Time frame
Baseline to 18 months post-enrollment
2

Change in Global Health-Related Quality of Life Score using Likert scale

Change in patient-reported quality of life measured using the PROMIS Global Health Scale (10-item instrument), generating: Physical health summary score Mental health summary score 0 (poor self reported health) -10 (best self reported health)

Time frame
Baseline to 18 months post-enrollment
3

Change in General Self-Efficacy using Likert scale

Change in perceived self-efficacy measured using the PROMIS General Self-Efficacy 10-item scale. Scores reflect participants' confidence in managing health and behavior and are reported as standardized scores. 1 ( Lowest Confidence ) - 5 ( Highest Confidence )

Time frame
Baseline to 18 months post-enrollment
4

Change in mean scores for Patient-Reported Access to and Experience with Healthcare as measures by CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems)

Patient-reported measures derived from CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) assessing: Global rating of healthcare Access barriers Insurance-related difficulties Outcomes reported as mean scores Count 0 (Worst Possible Assessment) to 10 (Best Possible Assessment)

Time frame
Baseline to 18 months post-enrollment

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: