About this trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to perform a PEEP titration protocol and use EIT to identify the optimal PEEP at which lung overdistention and collapse are most effectively balanced. The primary and secondary aims of the study are as follows:
Identify the difference between the optimal PEEP recommended by EIT metrics and the current guideline recommended approach to identifying optimal PEEP in PARDS. There will be a statistically significant difference in the recommended optimal PEEP identified using the EIT PEEP titration tool and that of the PEEP/FiO2 grid recommendations.
Determine the difference in physiologic metrics between EIT optimal PEEP and the PEEP/FiO2 recommended PEEP.
Participants will undergoing EIT monitoring while being subjected to PEEP titration protocol.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Any person who is less than 18 years of age
is on invasive mechanical ventilation
is not spontaneously breathing
meets PARDS criteria
Disqualifiers
Contraindication to the use of EIT
Hemodynamic instability
Contraindications to hypercapnia
patients with uncuffed endotracheal or tracheostomy tubes
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Electrical Impedance Tomography positive end-expiratory pressure titration
DeviceA PEEP titration will occur for the patient with the PEEP increased by 2 cm H2O every 2 minutes until a maximum PEEP of 20 or three steps (+ 6 cm H2O) above the set clinical PEEP. The PEEP will then be decreased by 2 cmH2O every 2 minutes until a minimum PEEP of 6 cmH2O or three steps (- 6 cm H2O) below their clinical PEEP.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
The absolute difference between the electrical impedence tomography (EIT) recommended PEEP and the PEEP recommended by the PEEP/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) grid.
Collected using electrical impedence tomography (EIT). The EIT device provides the percentages of alveolar overdistention and collapse at each PEEP level. The best PEEP by EIT is defined as the PEEP level above the intersection of curves representing relative alveolar overdistention and collapse.
Secondary outcomes
Lung recruitability, as measured by electrical impedence tomography, and its association with difference in optimal PEEP recommended by electrical impedence tomography versus the PEEP/FiO2 grid
Recruitability will be defined as the absolute reduction in the percentage of collapse when comparing the highest and lowest PEEP achieved, as measured by electrical impedence tomography.
Difference in systolic impendence, as a surrogate for cardiac output, using electrical impedence tomography at various PEEP levels
Using the electrical impedence tomography pulsatility filter/tool, a difference in systolic impendence, attributed to the cardiac cycle, can be calculated. This will be used as a surrogate for stroke volume and will be compared across PEEP levels.
Change in static compliance across different PEEP levels during a PEEP titration
Static compliance is defined as the change in volume divided by the change in pressure during an inspiratory hold (when airflow is zero). It reflects the elastic properties of the lung and chest wall.
Change in driving pressure across different PEEP levels during a PEEP titration
Driving pressure is the difference between the plateau pressure (the pressure measured during an inspiratory hold, when airflow is zero) and the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). It represents the pressure that actually distends the alveoli during mechanical ventilation.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.