About this trial
Robotic surgery requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning, which significantly impair respiratory mechanics and increase the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key determinant of lung recruitment; however, fixed PEEP strategies may not be optimal for all patients. Individualized PEEP titration strategies, including incremental and decremental approaches, may better optimize lung mechanics.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effects of incremental, decremental, and fixed PEEP strategies on cumulative mechanical power (MP-AUC) and postoperative oxygenation in patients undergoing robotic surgery.
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age>= 18
ASA I-III
Elective robotic surgery
Disqualifiers
COPD GOLD ≥2
Restrictive lung disease
BMI >40 kg/m²
Heart failure
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Fixed PEEP Ventilation
Procedure/SurgeryPatients receive mechanical ventilation with a constant positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH₂O throughout the surgical procedure.
Decremental PEEP Strategy
Procedure/SurgeryPEEP is gradually decreased from a higher level to determine the optimal PEEP associated with the lowest driving pressure or lowest mechanical power, and this level is maintained during surgery.
Incremental PEEP Strategy
Procedure/SurgeryPEEP is gradually increased from a lower level to identify the optimal PEEP corresponding to the lowest driving pressure or mechanical power, and this level is maintained during surgery.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Cumulative Mechanical Power (MP-AUC)
Total energy delivered to the respiratory system during surgery
Secondary outcomes
PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio
Oxygenation Index (OSI)
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPC)
Locations
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: