About this trial
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a major cause of mortality, with low survival probabilities to hospital discharge. Despite the frequent use of airway management and mechanical ventilation during resuscitation, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal ventilation strategy to improve oxygen delivery and patient outcomes. The present study aims to investigate the effects of positive-end-expiratory-pressure (PEEP) set at 5 mbar compared to zero-end-expiratory-pressure (ZEEP) on the return of spontaneous-circulation (ROSC) in adult patients with OHCA.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Adults >= 18 years
non-traumatic OHCA
mechanical ventilation via airway device
Disqualifiers
Patients < 18 years,
traumatic cause of OHCA,
no cardiac arrest, withholding of resuscitation (e.g. Do-Not-Resuscitate orders)
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
PEEP 5 mbar
Procedure/SurgeryPositiv-End-Expiratory Pressure
ZEEP 0 mbar
Procedure/SurgeryZero-End-Expiratory Pressure
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
The primary outcome is the ROSC, defined according to the Utstein template by the presence of a palpable pulse during or after resuscitation. This will be measured as a binary outcome (palpable pulse, yes or no).
Secondary outcomes
Re-Arrest-Rate
Any need for chest compressions after ROSC (yes vs. no)
Death during pre-hospital care phase
Any death during pre-hospital care phase (yes vs. no)
Hospital admission during ongoing resuscitation
Need for chest-compressions at hospital admission (yes vs. no)
Hospital admission with spontaneous circulation
Hospital admission with spontaneous circulation without need for chest compressions (yes vs. no)
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.