Performance and Safety of Assisted Vaginal Delivery With the Odon Device™ Versus Vacuum Extraction

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon

About this trial

This is a pivotal study designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the Odon Device™ versus vacuum extraction

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Woman aged over 18 years

Woman who has signed the informed consent form

The woman has a singleton pregnancy

The pregnancy is ≥37+0 weeks' gestation

Disqualifiers

Major congenital malformations diagnosed prenatally in the neonate

Contraindications to instrumental vaginal delivery

Intrauterine fetal death

Maternal latex allergy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Experimental: The BD Odon DeviceTM

    Device

    The BD Odon DeviceTM works by placing a cuff of air attached to a plastic sleeve, around the baby's head. The doctor then gently pulls on this sleeve and air cuff to assist the birth of the baby.

  • Active Comparator: Vacuum extraction group

    Device

    Ventouse is a device used to help a baby be born by putting it over the baby's head and using suction (= removing air) to pull the baby out of the mother's body.

Treatment groups

628 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: The BD Odon DeviceTMExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Vacuum extraction groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Demonstrate the non-inferiority of the ODON™ device compared with the obstetric vacuum extractor in assisted vaginal delivery.

Proportion of patients with a successful outcome in each randomized arm. Success will be defined as the successful completion of vaginal delivery using the assigned instrument. Failure will be defined as the need for a cesarean section or the sequential use of another type of instrument to complete the vaginal delivery.

Time frame
1 day

Secondary outcomes

1

Evaluate the neonatal and maternal safety of instrumental delivery

1. Neonatal safety: composite of adverse neonatal outcomes Number of participants whose neonate presents at least one of the following: death, umbilical arterial pH \< 7.2 ; Apgar score \< 7 at 5 minutes; admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; soft-tissue injury (bruising, caput succedaneum, cephalohematoma, subgaleal hemorrhage, laceration); jaundice requiring phototherapy. Time frame: \[From birth to day 28\] 2. Maternal safety : composite of adverse maternal outcomes Number of participants with at least one of the following: death, obstetric anal sphincter injury (perineal tear grade 3A, 3B, 3C or fourth-degree); cervical tear requiring suturing; estimated total blood loss ≥ 500 mL. Time frame: \[From delivery to day 28\]

Time frame
28 days
2

To assess the proportion of neonates with superficial soft tissue injuries

Time frame
28 days
3

To assess obstetrician satisfaction

The obstetrician will evaluate their satisfaction with the device by completing a paper assessment form satisfaction scale between 1 to 4, 1 for the best outcome ( 14 questions )

Time frame
1 day
4

To assess maternal satisfaction

QEVA/Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (QACE) : paper assessment form scale between 1 to 4, (the best outcome is 1 for some questions, and 4 for other) The questionnaire includes a total of 26 questions. QEVA/QACE : before hospital discharge ; at day 28 (mail); at day 90 (mail); at 1 year (mail)

Time frame
1 year

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: