Performance of the Treatment of Periodontitis According to the Bioperio® Protocol

ConditionPeriodontitis
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Pisa

About this trial

This multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study evaluated the clinical performance of the Bioperio® protocol, a standardized, patient-centered framework for managing periodontitis. The protocol combined professional supra-gingival scaling, oral hygiene instruction and motivation, full-mouth subgingival instrumentation, and-in Stage III/IV cases-adjunctive enamel matrix derivative application in deep pockets.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Confirmed diagnosis of periodontitis (proximal attachment loss in ≥2 non-adjacent teeth)

No previous treatment for periodontitis

Systemically healthy or with well-controlled chronic medical conditions

Willingness to participate in the study and comply with the follow-up schedule

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Patients previously treated for periodontitis

Poorly controlled systemic conditions

Refusal to participate

Trial population

adult patients diagnosed with periodontitis

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Periodontal non surgical treatment

    Procedure/Surgery

    Non surgical periodontal therapy performed with ultrasonics and manual instruments. In patients affected by stages III-IV periodontitis, the adjunctive usage of wound healing enhancers will be applied in sites with PPD \>5 mm.

  • Oral Hygiene Instructions

    Behavioral

    Patients will be motivated and instructed to improve their daily home dental plaque control through the usage of interdental devices and electric toothbrush.

  • Surgical Periodontal Treatment

    Procedure/Surgery

    In some selected patients, whose periodontal defects will not heal despite consecutive non surgical interventions, periodontal surgical treatment, with or without regenerative devices, will be implemented.

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Pocket Closure

Percentage of affected sites (probing pocket depth ≥4 mm at baseline) that achieve a probing pocket depth \<4 mm

Time frame
3 months and subsequent follow-ups
2

Periodontitis Patient Resolution

Number and percentage of participants showing no sites with PPD\>5 mm at 3 months and subsequent re-evaluation

Time frame
3 months and subsequent follow-ups

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)

Change in mean PPD from baseline to 3 months and subsequent re-evaluation. A decrease indicates periodontal condition improvement.

Time frame
3 months and subsequent follow-ups
2

Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

Change in mean CAL from baseline to 3 months and subsequent re-evaluation. A decrease indicates periodontal condition improvement.

Time frame
3 months and subsequent follow-ups
3

Change in Full-Mouth Bleeding Score (FMBS)

Change in FMBS from baseline to 3 months and subsequent re-evaluation. FMBS is a periodontal index used to assess gingival inflammation by recording the presence or absence of bleeding on probing at multiple sites around all teeth. Common systems include the Ainamo and Bay (1975) method, using a 6-site per tooth recording (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, distolingual, lingual, mesiolingual). The score is calculated as (number of bleeding sites / total number of sites examined) × 100%. So a percentage. Interpretation: low scores (\<10% usually healthy), 10-30% mild inflammation, \>30% significant inflammation. Clinical significance: high scores indicate poor oral hygiene, active gingivitis, risk for periodontitis progression, need for more frequent recall or scaling/root planing.

Time frame
3 months and subsequent follow-ups
4

Change in Number of Deep Pockets

Change in the number of sites with PPD ≥5 mm and ≥6 mm from baseline to 3 months and subsequent re-evaluation. A decrease indicates periodontal condition improvement.

Time frame
3 months and subsequent follow-ups

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.