Personalising Children's Screen Use Reduction for Better Sleep, Mental, and Brain Health

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age6-12
SponsorNational University of Singapore

About this trial

In Singapore, 64.4% of school-age children sleep less than the minimum recommended duration of 9 hours on school nights, thus risking poor mental, cognitive, and brain health. These short-sleeping children, however, spend on average 2.5 hours per school day on non-academic media use, revealing the potential of reducing their screen time for more sleep. Previous interventions targeted at reducing media use and/or improving sleep among school-age children, though effective in increasing sleep, required cooperation from schools, extensive personnel training, and high commitment of participants, rendering them difficult to implement in Singapore. Existing interventions also focused on evening or pre-bedtime screen use, and took a one-size-fits-all approach, ignoring individual differences in the duration, type, and purpose of media use throughout the day. Here, we propose a scalable approach to curtail media use based on individual need throughout the day. We will conduct a randomised controlled trial during term time, recruiting 150 children, aged 6-12 years, who on school days, sleep less than 8 hours and spend more than 2 hours on media use. At baseline, all participants will record their time use patterns. The research staff will then help the intervention group to repurpose at least 60 minutes of media use per school day for sleep. Importantly, participants can decide the type, timing and duration of media use to curtail, thus giving them a sense of agency and mastery, while boosting their self-efficacy, a vital ingredient in behavioural change. The intervention group will follow this personalised schedule for 2 weeks, while the control group will be in a free-living condition. Two weeks after the intervention has ended, the intervention group will undergo follow-up assessments. Throughout the study, sleep, time use, cognitive functions, and psychological well-being will be assessed daily. Other cognitive tasks and questionnaires will be conducted during 2-3 lab/school-classroom visits, with one-third of the participants also undergoing high-density electroencephalography to measure brain activity.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Is a Singaporean or Permanent Resident

Speaks English

Aged between 6-12 years old

Habitually sleeps less than 8 hours during school nights

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Screen-use reduction + Sleep extension

    Behavioral

    60 minutes of a participants' daily screen-use time on school days will be repurposed for more sleep time.

Treatment groups

150 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Screen-use reduction + Sleep extensionExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Free-living controlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in sustained attention assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task from baseline to manipulation (for both groups), from baseline to follow-up (for intervention group only), and from manipulation to follow-up period (for intervention group only)

Number of attention lapses. More lapses indicate worse performance.

Time frame
PVT will be assessed once daily (up to 3 weeks for the control group and up to 4 weeks for the intervention group) using EMA, and again at the end of the baseline, manipulation and follow-up period through a laptop-based test battery.
2

Change in sustained attention assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task from baseline to manipulation (for both groups), from baseline to follow-up (for intervention group only), and from manipulation to follow-up period (for intervention group only)

Mean reaction time. Longer mean reaction time indicate worse performance.

Time frame
PVT will be assessed once daily (up to 3 weeks for the control group and up to 4 weeks for the intervention group) using EMA, and again at the end of the baseline, manipulation and follow-up period through a laptop-based test battery.
3

Change in sustained attention assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task from baseline to manipulation (for both groups), from baseline to follow-up (for intervention group only), and from manipulation to follow-up period (for intervention group only)

Median reaction time. Longer median reaction time indicate worse performance.

Time frame
PVT will be assessed once daily (up to 3 weeks for the control group and up to 4 weeks for the intervention group) using EMA, and again at the end of the baseline, manipulation and follow-up period through a laptop-based test battery.
4

Change in sustained attention assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task from baseline to manipulation (for both groups), from baseline to follow-up (for intervention group only), and from manipulation to follow-up period (for intervention group only)

Standard deviation in reaction time. Larger standard deviation in reaction time indicate less consistent performance.

Time frame
PVT will be assessed once daily (up to 3 weeks for the control group and up to 4 weeks for the intervention group) using EMA, and again at the end of the baseline, manipulation and follow-up period through a laptop-based test battery.

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.