A Study of HRS-2129 in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorShandong Suncadia Medicine Co., Ltd.

About this trial

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of HRS-2129 in Chinese diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) in comparison to placebo.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Able and willing to provide a written informed consent.

Males or females aged ≥18years of age inclusive.

Diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) pain ≥ 3 months.

HbA1c ≤ 9.0% at screening and on a stable antidiabetic medication regimen for at least 30 days prior to screening as far as possible.

Disqualifiers

Subjects with a history of severe allergies.

Peripheral neuropathy or pain unrelated to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) that may confuse the assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP).

Subjects with abnormal liver and renal function.

Corrected QT Interval (QTc): > 450 ms (male), > 470 ms (female).

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • HRS-2129 Tablets

    Drug

    HRS-2129 tablets.

  • HRS-2129 Placebo

    Drug

    HRS-2129 placebo.

  • Pregabalin Capsules

    Drug

    Pregabalin capsules.

  • Pregabalin Capsules Placebo

    Drug

    Pregabalin capsules placebo.

Treatment groups

168 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: HRS-2129 High Dose GroupExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: HRS-2129 Low Dose GroupExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group C: Pregabalin GroupActive comparator 2 interventions
Group D: Blank Preparation Placebo GroupPlacebo comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Compare the change from baseline in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) between HRS-2129 and placebo at Week 4.

The mean change in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) was measured using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\]). The rating averaged over a 7-day period and was based on entries in patients' daily pain diaries.

Time frame
Baseline and Week 4.

Secondary outcomes

1

Compare the response rate between HRS-2129 and placebo at Week 4 (Proportion of subjects whose ADPS decreased by ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% from baseline).

Ratio of participants responding to treatment, as measured by Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) reduction from baseline. The ADPS is used to determine categorical response rates.

Time frame
Baseline and Week 4.
2

Compare the change from baseline in ADPS between HRS-2129 and placebo at Week 1 to 4.

The mean change in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) was measured using a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst possible pain\]). The rating averaged over a 7-day period and was based on entries in patients' daily pain diaries.

Time frame
From Week 1 to Week 4.
3

Compare the change from baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between HRS-2129 and placebo at Week 4.

VAS, in which the participant rates pain on a 100 mm-long horizontal line, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain.

Time frame
Baseline and Week 4.
4

Compare the change from baseline in Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) between HRS-2129 and placebo at Week 4.

Participants rate their pain in three parts of the questionnaire, which are combined into a single pain intensity score: Part 1 - 11 descriptors of pain intensity, and 4 descriptors of emotions, on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe); Part 2 - a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), in which the participant rates pain on a 100 mm-long horizontal line, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain; Part 3 - a Present Pain Intensity index in which the participant rates present pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 5 (most intense pain).

Time frame
Baseline and Week 4.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.