Comparison of Skeletal Effects of Herbst and Invisalign MA in Growing Patients With KLass II Malocclusion

ConditionMandibular Growth Stimulation

Trial statusRecruiting

Trial phasePhase 1

Trial typeInterventional

Biological sexAll

AgeUp to 15

SponsorUniversité Libre de Bruxelles

About this trial

This study aims to determine and compare the precise skeletal dental and soft tissue effect of Mandibular advancement aligners and Herbst Appliance.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

ANB greater than 4°.

Angle Class II molar and canine relationship

cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) CVM2/CVM3

Disqualifiers

CVM> 4

periodontal disease

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

Stimulation of mandibular growth.
Device
orthodontic treatment where a retrognathic mandibula is put into an anterior position to stimulate mandibular growth. This will happen by either the MA-invisalign system or the herbst appliance

Treatment groups

30 Participants

are divided into 2 treatment groups

Group A: Invisalign MA- group (mandibular advancement)Active comparator 1 intervention

Group B: Herbst groupActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

Mandibular lenghtening

Time frame

Difference between T1/T2. T1: Before Mandibular advancement phase, T2: Minimum 1 year after T1 and 2 months without mandibular advancement.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Université Libre de Bruxelles

Lead sponsor

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Apply now