CT-guided Percutaneous Radionuclide Therapy With 32P Microparticles in Patients With Non-progressive Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1, Phase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorM.R. Meijerink

About this trial

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a highly lethal cancer, and approximately 40% of patients present with non-metastatic locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) that is not suitable for surgical resection. To improve outcomes in this patient group, local ablative treatments are being explored. Radionuclide therapy (RNT) is a promising option that delivers high-dose internal radiation directly into the tumor, potentially achieving better local tumor control while sparing surrounding tissues compared with external-beam radiation therapy. The OncoSil™ device is a type of RNT containing Phosphorus-32-radiolabeled microparticles. The ³²P microparticles have been designed to deliver a localized distribution of beta-radiation within the target tumor up to 100 Gy, which causes direct damage to cancer cell DNA and renders them incapable of further cell division and proliferation. Favorable results have been reported by implanting ³²P microparticles intra-tumorally, which is typically administered via endoscopic ultrasound guidance. A percutaneous approach may allow for more precise and reproducible delivery, but prospective data on its safety and feasibility are lacking.

This prospective, single-arm phase 1-2 feasibility study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of percutaneous CT- guided RNT using ³²P microparticles in patients with non-progressive LAPC following induction chemotherapy. Twenty adult patients with pathology-confirmed LAPC, showing non-progressive disease according to RECIST, will be included after multidisciplinary tumor board review. Patients will undergo percutaneous, CT-guided implantation of ³²P microparticles under general anesthesia, sedation, or local analgesia depending on study phase and clinical judgment, followed by continuation of standard systemic chemotherapy and routine follow-up.

The primary endpoint is the rate of adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥3) occurring during the procedure and within 90 days afterward. Secondary endpoints include technical success, all adverse events, best overall respons, overall and progression-free survival, and changes in tumor markers.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age ≥18 years

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer, defined by the DPCG consensus criteria as: arterial involvement >90 degrees or venous involvement >270 degrees.

At least RECIST stable disease after a minimum two months of chemotherapy according to current clinical practice*

Capable of providing written and oral informed consent

Disqualifiers

Eligibility for resection

Participation in other trials focussing on different ablative treatment modalities such as radiofrequency ablation or irreversible electroporation for LAPC

Known hypersensitivity to silicon or phosphor

Bleeding disorders which cannot be corrected with medication

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • CT-guided percutaneous intratumoural implantation of the OncoSil™ device

    Device

    CT-guided percutaneous intratumoural implantation of the OncoSil™ device, containing ³²P microparticles as a form of radionucleide therapy for 20 patients diagnosed with RECIST-stable LAPC after 2 months of systemic therapy.

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: CT-guided percutaneous intratumoural implantation of ³²P microparticles for LAPCExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Safety defined as the rate of procedure- or device-related CTCAE grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) within 90 days after implantion.

Time frame
From implantation to 90 days after implantation

Secondary outcomes

1

Technical succes defined a the rate of adequate punctures and subsequent complete intratumoral delivery of the planned dose.

Time frame
Periprocedural.
2

Overall safety defined as the rate of adverse events.

Time frame
From implantation until 90 days after implantation.
3

Duration of implantation procedure defined as the total time of punction.

Time frame
Periprocedural.
4

Duration of overall procedure defined as the total time in the radiology suite.

Time frame
Periprocedural.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

M.R. Meijerink

Lead sponsor

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Sponsor institution