Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Peptide-induced Active Immunity in AML Maintenance Therapy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-70
SponsorFujian Medical University Union Hospital

About this trial

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia in adults. While approximately 70% of patients achieve complete remission (CR) with induction chemotherapy, traditional consolidation therapy (predominantly high-dose cytarabine) has a persistently high recurrence rate - nearly 30% at 1 year for low-risk groups and 80% for high-risk groups - with a long-term survival rate \<40%. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) improves survival but is limited by donor matching and patient tolerance, resulting in a transplantation rate \<20%. Clinically, there is an urgent need for a well-tolerated, low hepatotoxic/nephrotoxic maintenance regimen effective for preventing recurrence.

Tumor immunotherapy is a major breakthrough, and neoantigen-based personalized vaccines are a key anti-recurrence direction due to their strong tumor specificity and ability to induce long-term immune memory. However, existing neoantigen vaccines rely on NGS sequencing and bioinformatics for epitope screening, suffering from long development cycles, high costs, proneness to missing cancer-causing mutations, and poor clinical feasibility, hindering widespread use. This study adopts a patented Sino-US innovative technology: in vitro induction of patients' own AML cells to obtain a complete set of tumor antigen peptides for personalized vaccine preparation, circumventing traditional bottlenecks to achieve "full antigen coverage" personalized active immunity.

This study has significant clinical and scientific value: (1) It is the first application of this patented technology in AML maintenance therapy, filling domestic and international research gaps and providing a novel treatment option; (2) Using a randomized controlled design, it compares the efficacy of immunotherapy administered during vs. after consolidation chemotherapy to identify the optimal treatment mode; (3) It screens reliable anti-leukemia immunity monitoring methods and time points, offering evidence-based support for efficacy evaluation and prognostic prediction; (4) It verifies the treatment's safety, laying a foundation for developing low-toxic, high-efficacy AML maintenance regimens, ultimately improving patients' long-term survival and advancing precision immunotherapy for AML.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in accordance with the 2018 WHO Classification and Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Leukemias; received 1-2 courses of conventional chemotherapy, achieved remission, and are undergoing routine consolidation therapy.

Aged 18 to 70 years.

Receiving a maintenance therapy regimen without hormonal agents.

Leukocyte and lymphocyte counts have basically returned to the normal range.

Disqualifiers

Patients who still require hormonal maintenance therapy after achieving remission.

Patients with a concomitant history of other malignant tumors or a history of uncontrolled malignant tumors.

Having participated in other clinical trials within 1 month prior to screening.

Complicated with uncontrolled cerebrovascular diseases, coagulation disorders, connective tissue diseases and other similar conditions.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Active Immunotherapy

    Biological/Vaccine

    Personalized tumor vaccines are prepared from the patient's own acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells and administered via intradermal injection to induce the body to generate a specific anti-leukemia immune response.

  • after 6 courses of routine consolidation chemotherapy

    Other intervention

    Initiation of active immunotherapy either during the 6 courses of routine consolidation chemotherapy or after the completion of consolidation chemotherapy, based on the patient's treatment phase.

  • during 6 courses of routine consolidation chemotherapy

    Other intervention

    Initiation of active immunotherapy either during the 6 courses of routine consolidation chemotherapy or after the completion of consolidation chemotherapy, based on the patient's treatment phase.

Treatment groups

90 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: 6 courses of routine consolidation chemotherapyNo intervention 0 interventions
Group B: Active immunotherapy administered during 6 courses of routine consolidation chemotherapyExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: Active immunotherapy administered after 6 courses of routine consolidation chemotherapyExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

overall survival (OS)

subjects survival after treatment are finished

Time frame
1-year
2

overall remission rate (ORR)

subjects achieving complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) at the end of cycle 1and cycle 2(each cycle is 1 month)

Time frame
At the end of Cycle 1 and Cycle 12 (each cycle is 1 month)

Secondary outcomes

1

Time to Response(TTR)

The time from initiation of the study treatment to the first documentation of CR or PR.

Time frame
1-2months(1-2 courses)
2

Duratin of Response(DOR)

The time from first documentation of CR to the first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first

Time frame
1-year
3

Progression-Free Survival(PFS)

The time interval from the start of the study treatment to the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause,whichever occurs first

Time frame
1-year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.