European Proof-of-Concept Therapeutic Stratification Trial of Molecular Anomalies in Relapsed or Refractory Tumors

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1, Phase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeUp to 18
SponsorGustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

About this trial

This proof-of-concept platform trial is designed to cover the targeting of several survival pathways in oncogenesis that are currently not adequately employed for pediatric patients in Europe (Geoerger 2017; Geoerger 2019).

The aims of the trial are:

1. To determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of a specific anticancer agent and/or a relevant combination in a pediatric population, to document its tolerability and 2. To explore first signals of activity in a molecularly enriched study population.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients must be diagnosed with a haematologic or solid tumor malignancy that has progressed despite standard therapy, or for which no effective standard therapy exists.

Age < 18 years at inclusion; patients 18 years and older may be included after discussion with the sponsor if they have a pediatric recurrent/refractory malignancy.

Patient must have had advanced molecular profiling (i.e. WES/WGS +/- RNAseq) of their recurrent or refractory tumor i.e. at the time of disease progression/relapse; exceptionally patients with advanced molecular profiling at diagnosis may be allowed.

Evaluable or measurable disease as defined by standard imaging criteria for the patient's tumor type (RECIST v1.1, RANO criteria for patients with HGG, INRC criteria for patients with NB, Leukemia criteria, etc.).

Disqualifiers

Patients with symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases who are neurologically unstable or require increasing doses of corticosteroids or local CNS-directed therapy to control their CNS disease. Patients on stable doses of corticosteroids for at least 7 days prior to receiving study drug may be included.

Impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may significantly alter drug absorption of oral drugs (e.g., ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or malabsorption syndrome).

Clinically significant, uncontrolled heart disease (including history of any cardiac arrhythmias, e.g., ventricular, supraventricular, nodal arrhythmias, or conduction abnormality, unstable ischemia,congestive heart failure within 12 months of screening)

Active viral hepatitis or known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or any other uncontrolled infection.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ribociclib

    Drug
  • Topotecan

    Drug
  • Temozolomide

    Drug
  • Everolimus

    Drug
  • Adavosertib

    Drug
  • Carboplatin

    Drug
  • Olaparib

    Drug
  • Irinotecan

    Drug
  • Vistusertib

    Drug
  • Nivolumab

    Drug
  • Cyclophosphamide

    Drug
  • Selumetinib

    Drug
  • Enasidenib

    Drug
  • Lirilumab

    Drug
  • Fadraciclib

    Drug
  • Cytarabine

    Drug
  • Dexamethasone

    Drug
  • Ceralasertib

    Drug
  • Futibatinib

    Drug
  • Capmatinib

    Drug
  • Avelumab

    Drug
  • Peposertib

    Drug
  • Capivasertib

    Drug
  • Vinorelbine

    Drug

Treatment groups

472 Participants
are divided into 18 treatment groups

18

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Arm A. Ribociclib + Topotecan and TemozolomideExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Arm B. Ribociclib + EverolimusExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: ARM C. Adavosertib + CarboplatinExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group D: Arm D. Olaparib + IrinotecanExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group E: Arm E. Vistusertib single agentExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group F: Arm F. Vistusertib + Topotecan and TemozolomideExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group G: Arm G. Nivolumab + Cyclophosphamide +/- RadiotherapyExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group H: Arm H. Selumetinib + VistusertibExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group I: Arm I. EnasidenibExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group J: Arm J. Lirilumab + NivolumabExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group K: Arm K. Fadraciclib (CYC065) + TemozolomideExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group L: Arm L. Fadraciclib (CYC065) + CytarabineExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group M: Arm M. Ribociclib + Everolimus +/- DexamethasoneExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group N: Arm N. Ceralasertib (AZD6738) + OlaparibExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group O: Arm O. Futibatinib (TAS-120)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group P: Arm P. Capmatinib (INC280) + EverolimusExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group Q: Arm Q. Peposertib + Avelumab and Metronomic TemozolomideExperimental treatment 3 interventions
Group R: Arm R. Capivasertib + metronomic VinorelbineExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Recommended phase II dose (RP2D)

Defined as the adult recommended dose (adjusted for weight or BSA) if toxicity and/or PK profiling are similar in children and in adults, or a higher dose, providing it is below or equal to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)

Time frame
During the first cycle
2

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

The MTD will be defined as the dose associated with or closest to 25% of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

Time frame
During the first cycle
3

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Defined as the proportion of participants who achieved a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed by investigators. In patients with leukemia, ORR is defined as the percentage of patients attaining CR, CRi or CRp.

Time frame
During treatment period

Secondary outcomes

1

Pharmacokinetics (PK)

To characterize single or multiple-dose PK of the agent(s)

Time frame
Depending on the treatment arm
2

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Defined as the time from treatment initiation until the date of first documented progression (clinically or radiologically) or death from any cause. Patients alive and free of progression at the cut-off date will be censored at the last assessment date.

Time frame
From treatment initiation until the date of first documented progression or death
3

Evaluation of duration of response (DoR)

Defined as the time period between the first documented response (complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) and the time of progression, according to RECIST v1.1, RANO criteria for patients with HGG, INRC criteria for patients with NB, etc.

Time frame
Between the first document response and the time of first documented progression

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute, France

Collaborator

Fight Kids Cancer

Collaborator

Fondation ARC

Collaborator