Fecal Microbiota Transplant and Dietary Fiber Supplementation for the Treatment of Gut Graft Versus Host Disease

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer Center

About this trial

This phase I trial studies how well fecal microbiota transplant and dietary fiber supplementation work in treating patients with gut graft versus host disease. Fecal microbiota transplant entails inoculating donor stool into a recipient's gastrointestinal tract. Changing the gut microbiome by fecal microbiota transplant and fiber supplementation may help treat gut graft versus host disease.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

18 years of age or older

History of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in the past 365 days

Post-engraftment, defined by time period following three consecutive days of sustained neutrophil engraftment with an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 cells/mm^3

Modified Glucksberg criteria for GI GvHD averaged over 3 consecutive days and without another explanation for diarrhea such as laxative use or infection. In patients who have already had GI biopsy, biopsy histology must be compatible with GVHD, although biopsy is not required

Disqualifiers

History of previous serious adverse events associated with FMT

History of bowel perforation in the last 90 days

History of gastrointestinal resection in the last 90 days

History of small bowel obstruction without surgical intervention in the last 30 days, or 90 days with surgery, or history of large bowel obstruction in last 90 days

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Colonoscopy

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy

  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given upper FMT PO or via post-pyloric or NG feeding tube

  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

    Biological/Vaccine

    Undergo lower FMT via colonoscopy

  • Nutritional Supplementation

    Dietary supplement

    Given dietary fiber supplementation PO or via post-pyloric or NG feeding tube

  • Survey Administration

    Other intervention

    Ancillary studies

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo tissue, stool, stool swabs, and blood sample collection

Treatment groups

72 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Arm I (upper FMT)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Arm II (Lower FMT)Experimental treatment 4 interventions
Group C: Arm III (upper FMT, fiber supplementation)Experimental treatment 4 interventions
Group D: Arm IV (Lower FMT, fiber supplementation)Experimental treatment 5 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Bacterial composition of stool

Analyses will consist of summary statistics of the bacterial diversity in the microbiome (e.g., the alpha diversity, the abundance of bacterial species associated with protection from graft versus host disease \[GvHD\]).

Time frame
At baseline
2

Bacterial genes in stool

Specifically abundance of genes related to fiber fermentation and short chain fatty acids production metabolites in stool, specifically short chain fatty acids will be assessed.

Time frame
At baseline
3

Incidence of adverse events

Will by assessed by computing the total number of adverse events (AE)s and serious adverse events (SAE)s, the number per patient, and the number of patients with at least one event. The type of AE/SAE and whether the AE/SAE is related to the fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) or not will be tabulated. These summaries will be computed overall as well as by randomization arm and stratification factor (steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status). The odds will be compared of at least one SAE per patient by randomization arm and stratification factor using logistic regression with independent variables for route of FMT administration, fiber supplementation, and steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status. Interaction terms will be considered between these factors and may use exact or firth logistic regression in the event that some categories have zero patients with a SAE.

Time frame
Up to 3 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Complete response (CR) after the initial FMT

Will be defined by stage 0 on the Modified Glucksberg GvHD scale, without abdominal pain or hematochezia. To account for variability in this measure, patient stool volume (inpatients only) and survey data (both inpatients and outpatients) from days 25-27 will be used to determine whether patients meet these criteria or not. Inpatients will be a compare measured stool volumes to those reported via survey, to assess how well the survey data may serve as a surrogate for stool volume. Subjects who die before day 28 will be counted as no CR. The number and proportion of patients with CR by steroid-responsive, versus steroid-dependent or -refractory disease status, and each randomization arm (route of FMT administration and receipt of fiber supplementation) as well as within combinations of these factors will be computed. To test for differences in CR by these factors, logistic regression models similar to those described above for SAE comparisons.

Time frame
At day 28
2

CR or partial response (PR) after the initial FMT

Will be assessed by CR or PR at day 28 will use similar analysis methods as to the CR at day 28 outcome analysis.

Time frame
At day 28
3

Gut and overall GvHD grade

Will be assessed using the Modified Glucksberg scale measurements at baseline and throughout follow-up to summarize decrease in stool volume. For both of these ordinal outcomes (GvHD grade and Modified Glucksberg scale stage), descriptive statistics and graphical summaries to show changes over time by stratification factor and randomization arm. Generalized linear mixed effects models to test for differences in these outcomes by stratification factor and randomization arm.

Time frame
Up to 6 months
4

Six-month survival

Will be evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression with independent variables for the steroid- responsive, versus steroid-dependent or - refractory disease and randomization arm as specified in previous models.

Time frame
At 6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Collaborator