Pembrolizumab Plus CA-4948 for the Treatment of Patients With Progressive Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Despite Prior Immunotherapy

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, best dose, and effectiveness of emavusertib (CA-4948) in combination with pembrolizumab in treating patients with urothelial cancer that has spread from where it first started to other places in the body (metastatic) and that has a resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. CA-4948, a kinase inhibitor, may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body's immune system attack the tumor, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving CA-4948 in combination with pembrolizumab may be safe, tolerable and/or effective in treating patients with metastatic urothelial cancer that is resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients must have histologically confirmed urothelial cancer that is metastatic or unresectable and must have had the prior treatments outlined

Age ≥ 18 years

Because no dosing or adverse event data are currently available on the use of CA-4948 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients < 18 years of age, children are excluded from this study, but will be eligible for future pediatric trials

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥ 60%) within 28 days prior to registration

Disqualifiers

Patients who have not recovered from adverse events due to prior anti-cancer therapy (i.e., have residual toxicities > grade 1) Note: Patients with grade ≤ 2 neuropathy or grade ≤ 2 alopecia are an exception to this criterion and may qualify for the study. Note: If patients received major surgery, they must have recovered adequately from the toxicity and/or complications from the intervention prior to starting therapy

Diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving chronic systemic steroid therapy (in dosing exceeding 10 mg daily of prednisone equivalent) or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior the first dose of study drug

Grade ≥ 3 immune related adverse event with prior PD-1/PD-L1 blockade

History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to CA-4948 and/or pembrolizumab

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biopsy Procedure

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo tumor biopsy

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Emavusertib

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given PO

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Pembrolizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET

Treatment groups

27 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Treatment (CA-4948, pembrolizumab)Experimental treatment 7 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs)

Adverse events (AEs) will be graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0. Occurrence of DLTs along with count and percentage of subjects experiencing DLTs will be summarized. Safety of the combination regimen will be summarized by the number of adverse events as well as by the number and percentage of subjects experiencing the adverse events in both dose escalation and expansion cohorts. The safety summary will include count and percentage for overall and by AE type, seriousness, severity, attribution, anticipated or not. Furthermore, toxicity index will be calculated as a summary index for each patient to summarize multiple AEs.

Time frame
Up to completion of cycle 1
2

Recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D)

The RP2D may be determined to be the highest dose level, the maximum tolerated dose, or it may be a lower dose based on the consensus of the investigators, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program and pharmaceutical company collaborators.

Time frame
Up to completion of cycle 1
3

Incidence of AEs

AEs will be graded using NCI CTCAE v 5.0. Safety will be summarized by the number of AEs as well as by the number and percentage of subjects experiencing the AEs in both the dose escalation and dose expansion phases of the study. The safety summary will include count and percentage for overall and by AE type, seriousness, severity, attribution, anticipated or not. Toxicity will be calculated as a summary index for each patient to summarize multiple AEs.

Time frame
Up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment

Secondary outcomes

1

Objective response rate (ORR)

ORR will be defined as the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria at 9 weeks. The number of confirmed responses will be reported along with a corresponding two-sided 95% Wilson confidence interval (CI) and p-value will be reported from Binomial exact test.

Time frame
At 9 weeks
2

Progression-free survival (PFS)

PFS will be defined as the time from initial treatment to any progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median PFS time will be presented together with two-sided 95% CIs calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. The frequency (number and percentage) of participants with an event (progression or death) and censoring reasons will be presented (alive, withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up).

Time frame
At initial treatment to progression or death up to 2 years after last dose of study treatment
3

Overall survival (OS)

OS will be defined as the duration from the first date of study treatment to the date of death. Kaplan-Meyer estimates of median OS will be presented together with two-sided 95% CIs calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. the frequency of participants with an event and censoring reasons will be presented.

Time frame
At start of study treatment to death up to 2 years after last dose of study treatment
4

Duration of response (DOR)

DOR will be defined as the time from date of the first documentation of response to the first documentation of progression of disease or death due to any cause in the absence of documented progression of disease. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median DOR time will be presented together with two-sided 95% CIs calculated according to Brookmeyer and Crowley. The frequency of participants with an event and censoring reasons will be presented.

Time frame
At first response to progression or death up to 2 years after last dose of study treatment

Other outcomes

1

Clinical benefit rate (CBR)

CBR will be defined as the proportion of patients achieving a CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 criteria at 9 weeks or stable disease at 9 weeks accompanied by a 1.5 or greater reduction in hrCRP. CBR will be reported along with a corresponding two-sided 95% Wilson CI and p-value will be reported from Binomial exact test.

Time frame
At 9 weeks
2

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)

CRP response rate will be defined as achieving a ≥ 1.5 fold reduction in CRP at 9 weeks. The CRP response rate will be reported along with a corresponding two-sided 95% Wilson CI and p-value will be reported from Binomial exact test. Linear mixed models will also be fitted for comparisons between patients achieving and not achieving an objective response and between patients achieving and not achieving clinical benefit. Random effects with autoregressive model of order 1 will be incorporated to describe the correlation of repeated measures. Univariable PH Cox regression models for PFS and OS will also be fitted with hsCRP levels either at baseline or as a time-dependent continuous covariate.

Time frame
At 9 weeks
3

Cytokines and chemokines

Linear mixed models will also be used for comparisons between patients achieving and not achieving an objective response and between patients achieving and not achieving clinical benefit. Random effects with autoregressive model of order 1 will be incorporated to describe the correlation of repeated measures. Residual plots will be used to check model assumptions. Univariable PH Cox regression models for PFS and OS will also be fitted with cytokine and chemokine levels either at baseline or as time-dependent continuous covariates. Schoenfeld residuals will be used to check PH assumption. P-values will be adjusted by false discovery rate of 5%.

Time frame
At baseline and up to 2 years after last dose of study treatment
4

Multiplex immunohistochemistry markers

A paired t-test will be used to test whether there are a reduction of SPP1+ MoMacs and an increase in intra-tumoral T cells from baseline to on-treatment time points. Univariable logistic regression models will be fitted for ORR and CBR as response variables with either marker levels at baseline or change in marker levels as continuous covariates. PH Cox regression models for PFS and OS will also be fitted with marker levels either at baseline or as time-dependent continuous covariates. Schoenfeld residuals will be used to check PH assumption. P-values will be adjusted by false discovery rate of 5%.

Time frame
At baseline and up to 2 years after last dose of study treatment

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.