Phase I-IIa, to Evaluate the Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of the Use of BIOCLEFT in the Treatment of Cleft Palate.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1, Phase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age10-14
SponsorElisa María Cubiles Montero de Espinosa

About this trial

Phase I/II, controlled, open-label, randomized, single site clinical trial to assess the safety and feasibility, as well as hint efficacy evidence of a bioengineered palate mucosa substitute on nanostructured fibrin-agarose scaffolds with autologous mucosa tissue-specific cells (culture-expanded fibroblasts and keratinocytes), for tissue replacement and repair of donor area after the reconstruction of palate cleft defects (staphylorraphy), in comparison with standard care for donor mucosa.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Pediatric patients, of both sexes.

Diagnosis of total unilateral non-syndromic cleft lip and palate (FLPNS) that will undergo surgery for correction.

Children who have previously donated a sample of oral mucosa during the cleft lip repair procedure (cheiloplasty).

Informed consent signed by one or both parents (or legal guardian) adequately informed of the study and willing to follow the trial procedures and instructions.

Disqualifiers

Active infectious diseases.

Allergies or hypersensitivity to any of the components/excipients of the Investigational Product.

Severe hematological disorders/blood dyscrasias.

Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction/failure.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • implantation with an autologous human palatal mucosa substitute made of nanostructured fibrin-agarose generated by tissue engineering (BIOCLEFT).

    Procedure/Surgery

    cleft palate repair surgery, all patients in the study will receive the standard treatment (uranostaphyllorrhaphy), with the only difference that patients assigned to the experimental study group will additionally have BIOCLEFT tissue obtained through tissue engineering grafted onto them. the lateral area of the palatine bone exposed when mobilizing the flaps. For the implant, the BIOCLEFT fabric will be placed in the area of exposed bone, sized to the size of the defect and sutured using uncoated, monofilament long-term absorbable synthetic suture.

Treatment groups

15 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: experimentalExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: control groupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Evaluate implant´s feasibility and appearance of adverse events and serious adverse events related to treatment

Incidence of Serious Adverse Events after at the time of the implant of study drug.

Time frame
24 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Evaluation of the time of the regeneration and healing of the lateral defect of the palatine bone from the moment of the intervention

Time frame
24 months
2

Evaluation of the aesthetic result through analysis of photographs

A scale designed ad hoc for the present trial will be used (aesthetic appearance assessment scale)

Time frame
24 months
3

Preliminary evaluation of craniofacial growth through analysis of craniofacial photographs

Time frame
24 months
4

Hearing evaluation

Otoscopic/otomicroscopic examination and tympanogram by the otorhinolaryngologist, and placement of aeration tubes if considered necessary. The need or not to perform follow-up during the trial visits will be assessed depending on whether or not the patient presents any type of pathology.

Time frame
24 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Elisa María Cubiles Montero de Espinosa

Lead sponsor

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía Oriental

Sponsor institution

Andalusian Network for Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies

Collaborator