Radioembolization With Tremelimumab and Durvalumab for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Oligo-Metastatic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMayo Clinic

About this trial

This phase I trial tests the safety and side effects of yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization combined with immunotherapy drugs tremelimumab and durvalumab in treating patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (cancer of the bile ducts in the liver) that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced) and cannot be removed by surgery (unresectable) who are not candidates for curative therapy or that has spread from where it first started (primary side) to multiple other places in the body (oligo-metastatic). Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare but aggressive cancer with limited curative options outside of surgery. Immunotherapy has shown modest benefit in hepatobiliary (liver, bile ducts, and gallbladder) cancers including cholangiocarcinoma. Radioembolization is a type of radiation therapy used to treat liver cancer that is advanced or has come back where tiny beads that hold the radioactive substance (radioisotope) yttrium Y90 are injected into or near the hepatic artery (the main blood vessel that carries blood to the liver). The beads collect in the tumor and the Y90 gives off radiation. This destroys the blood vessels that the tumor needs to grow and kills the tumor cells. A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab and tremelimumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving Y90 radioembolization in combination with tremelimumab and durvalumab immunotherapy may be safe and beneficial in treating patients with locally advanced, unresectable or oligo-metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who are not candidates for curative therapy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age >= 18 years with body weight > 30 kg

Histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma that is not amenable to resection, transplantation, or thermal ablation. Oligometastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is also eligible. Specifically, such patients must have EITHER =< 3 malignant extrahepatic lymph nodes (short axis diameter >= 3cm) OR metastatic lesions in one organ other than liver (if only single lesion is present diameter MUST be < 3cm, if up to 3 lesions in one organ each lesion MUST be =< 1cm)

Measurable disease

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1

Disqualifiers

Concurrent enrollment in another clinical study, unless it is an observational clinical study or during the follow up period of an interventional study

Surgery =< 28 days prior to registration

Chemotherapy =< 4 weeks prior to registration

History of > 1 prior systemic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma not including that in the adjuvant setting. Patients who progressed during or =< 6 months from completion of adjuvant therapy are excluded

Trial design

Design model

Sequential

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Angiography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo mapping angiography

  • Biopsy

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo biopsy

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo CT

  • Durvalumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo MRI

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

  • Tremelimumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Yttrium-90 Microsphere Radioembolization

    Procedure/Surgery

    Receive transarterial Y90 radioembolization

Treatment groups

16 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Cohort I: (Y90, tremelimumab on day 1, cycle 1, durvalumab)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group B: Cohort II: (Y90, tremelimumab on day 14, cycle 1, durvalumab )Experimental treatment 9 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability) (Cohort 1)

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) will be defined as an adverse event (AE) attributed as definitely, probably, or possibility related to the study treatment in the first cycle. All the relevant results pertaining to toxicity will be examined in an exploratory and hypothesis-generating fashion. The number and severity of all adverse events will be tabulated and summarized in this patient population. The grade 3+ AEs will also be described and summarized in a similar fashion. Toxicity is defined as AEs that are classified as either possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment. Non-hematologic toxicities will be evaluated via the ordinal Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) standard toxicity grading. Hematologic toxicity measures of thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and leukopenia will be assessed using continuous variables as the outcome measures (primarily nadir) as well as categorization via CTC standard toxicity grading. Overall toxicity will be explored and summarized.

Time frame
Day 0 to day 28
2

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability) (Cohort 2)

DLTs will be defined as an AE attributed as definitely, probably, or possibility related to the study treatment in the first cycle. All the relevant results pertaining to toxicity will be examined in an exploratory and hypothesis-generating fashion. The number and severity of all adverse events will be tabulated and summarized in this patient population. The grade 3+ AEs will also be described and summarized in a similar fashion. Toxicity is defined as AEs that are classified as either possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment. Non-hematologic toxicities will be evaluated via the ordinal CTC standard toxicity grading. Hematologic toxicity measures of thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and leukopenia will be assessed using continuous variables as the outcome measures (primarily nadir) as well as categorization via CTC standard toxicity grading. Overall toxicity will be explored and summarized.

Time frame
Day 14 to day 42

Secondary outcomes

1

Overall efficacy

Will be assessed by response rate modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) (PERCIST).

Time frame
Up to 24 months
2

Median progression free survival

Timed endpoints and will be examined in an exploratory and hypothesis-generating fashion.

Time frame
Up to 24 months
3

Median overall survival

Timed endpoints and will be examined in an exploratory and hypothesis-generating fashion.

Time frame
Up to 24 months
4

Objective response rate (complete response and partial response)

Best response is defined to be the best objective status. The modified RECIST version 1.1, mRECIST and PERCIST criteria will be used for tumor evaluation and patients. Responses will be summarized by simple descriptive summary statistics delineating complete and partial responses as well as stable and progressive disease in this patient population (overall and by tumor group).

Time frame
From the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence, assessed up to 24 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.