REscuing Bone Marrow Function in Patients with AplaStic AnaEmia and Bone Marrow FaiLure Post AllogEneiC Transplantation 2

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 1, Phase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorMelbourne Health

About this trial

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation involves the transplanting of donor blood stem cells into a recipient, this is performed mainly for the treatment of blood cancers. The bone marrow is the organ that produces all blood cells and allogeneic stem cell transplantation results in the replacement of abnormal recipient bone marrow with donor blood cells as well as the production of donor immune cells from the donor bone marrow. The production of donor immune cells will hopefully lead to an immune response directed at any persisting cancerous cells leading to their eradication. As such, one of the key measures of success of a transplant is establishment of donor engraftment.

Engraftment is considered successful when the patient has normal blood cell counts on routine laboratory testing as well as confirmation that the blood cells are being produced by donor bone marrow cells. Confirming donor blood cell production is done by a process called chimerism. Poor graft function (PGF) is a complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation related to engraftment, manifested by low blood counts despite complete donor chimerism. This has significant consequences for the patient leaving them susceptible to infection because of low white blood cells and bleeding because of low platelets (the cell components that are important for blood clotting). There is currently no established treatment for this condition and patients with this condition who do not recover have a poor survival.

Aplastic anaemia (AA) is a rare autoimmune condition that results in a patient's own immune system attacking important components of their bone marrow resulting in low blood counts. The current treatments for AA include suppressing the immune system or a bone marrow transplant, however long term survival for patients who do not respond to these treatments or relapse is poor and more effective treatments are required.

There is emerging evidence that demonstrates that the components of the immune system are dysfunctional and result in excessive immune activation resulting in suppression of the bone marrow characteristic of PGF. Similar features of immune dysfunction has been demonstrated in AA. Ruxolitinib is a drug that may be able to reduce this excessive immune activation. Eltrombopag is a drug that has been shown to stimulate the production of blood cells. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the combination of ruxolitinib and eltrombopag is safe and effective in the treatment of PGF and AA.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Poor Graft function OR Relapsed/refractory AA

30x109 /L from D40-D60 OR

50 x10 9/L from D60 onwards; Neutropenia requiring filgrastim support at any time post D40; Hb less than 80g/L;

Relapsed /Refractory AA defined as: Relapse after stem cell transplant OR relapsed post/refractory to 1st line immunosuppression without an unrelated donor identified.

Disqualifiers

Active Grade 3-4 acute GVHD

Relapsed or progressive disease on screening bone marrow biopsy or most recent PET imaging.

Active second malignancy currently requiring treatment

Human Immuno-deficiency Virus (HIV) infection.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Ruxolitinib (JAKAVI®)

    Drug

    Initial starting dose will be 10mg BD

  • Eltrombopag (Revolade®)

    Drug

    Initial starting dose will be 50mg daily

Treatment groups

20 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Ruxolitinib and EltrombopagExperimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Complete Response at 12 weeks

Number of patients with Complete Response (CR) at 12 weeks defined as: 1. Neutrophils greater than or equal to 1.5x10\^9/L 2. Platelets greater than or equal to 100x10\^9/L without use of transfusions or cytokine support

Time frame
12 weeks
2

Grade 2 or Higher Non-Haematologic Toxicity

Rates of grade 2 or higher non haematologic toxicity as graded by the national cancer institute toxicity criteria version 5

Time frame
From study enrolment to study completion (maximum of 1 year per subject)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: