Split Course Adaptive Radiation Therapy With Pembrolizumab With/Without Chemotherapy for Treating Stage IV Lung Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1, Phase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

About this trial

This phase I/II trial tests the safety and efficacy of split-course adaptive radiation therapy in combination with immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with stage IV lung cancer or lung cancer that that has spread to nearby tissue or lymph nodes (locally advanced). Radiation therapy is a standard cancer treatment that uses high energy rays to kill cancer cells and shrink tumors. Split-course adaptive radiation therapy uses patient disease response to alter the intensity of the radiation therapy. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies such as pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, cemiplimab, atezolizumab or nivolumab may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Chemotherapy drugs like carboplatin, pemetrexed, and paclitaxel work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving split-course adaptive radiation therapy with standard treatments like immunotherapy and chemotherapy may be more effective at treating stage IV or locally advanced lung cancer than giving them alone.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age >= 18 years at time of informed consent

• Histologically documented or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of stage IVA or IVB (M1b or M1c) or locally advanced (not eligible for standard of care [SOC] chemoradiation) non-small cell lung cancer with evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1 criteria

Available tumor material (< 6 months old) adequate for confirmation of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression per local standard of care testing

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2

Disqualifiers

Mixed small cell histology

Confirmed candidate (per study physician) for alternative systemic therapy if preferred by treating physician (i.e. mEGFR, ALK, KRAS G12C or ROS1 mutations). Testing not required for enrollment

Brain metastases that would require administration of whole brain radiotherapy for management on required screening brain MRI within 21 days of day 1 of study treatment

Symptomatic malignant ascites or malignant pleural effusion (sampling not required). Pleural metastases are allowed if deemed targetable with radiotherapy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Correlative studies

  • Carboplatin

    Drug

    Given carboplatin

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

  • Fludeoxyglucose F-18

    Other intervention

    Given IV

  • Nab-paclitaxel

    Drug

    Given nab-paclitaxel

  • Pembrolizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given pembrolizumab

  • Pemetrexed

    Drug

    Given pemetrexed

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

  • Radiation Therapy

    Radiation

    Undergo radiation therapy

  • [18-F] (fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (FSPG) PET scan

    Other intervention

    Undergo PET scan

  • Ipilimumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given Ipilimumab

  • Nivolumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given Nivolumab

  • Cemiplimab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given Cemiplimab

  • Atezolizumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given Atezolizumab

Treatment groups

25 Participants
are divided into 11 treatment groups

11

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: Arm 1 (carboplatin, pemetrexed, pembrolizumab, radiation)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group B: Arm II (carboplatin, pemetrexed, cemiplimab, radiation)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group C: Arm III (carboplatin, paclitaxel, cemiplimab-rwlc, radiation)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group D: Arm IV (Carbo, pemetrexed, nivolumab, ipilimumab, radiation)Experimental treatment 10 interventions
Group E: Arm V (Carboplatin, paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, radiation)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group F: Arm VI (Carboplatin, paclitaxel, cemiplimab-rwlc, radiation)Experimental treatment 9 interventions
Group G: Arm VII (carbo, paclitaxel, nivolumab, ipilimumab, radiation)Experimental treatment 10 interventions
Group H: Arm VIII (pembrolizumab, radiation)Experimental treatment 7 interventions
Group I: Arm IX (atezolizumab, radiation)Experimental treatment 7 interventions
Group J: Arm X (cemiplimab-rwlc, radiation)Experimental treatment 7 interventions
Group K: Arm XI (nivolumab, ipilumumab, radiation)Experimental treatment 8 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of adverse events

Safety endpoints will be tabulated using descriptive statistics, and by appropriate subgroups. The incidence of adverse events will be summarized according to organ system in terms of severity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and relationship to treatment

Time frame
Up to 2 years
2

Best overall response rate

By Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Exact binomial test and 95% confidence interval (CI) will be used.

Time frame
Within 6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Progression free survival (PFS)

Estimation of the treatment effect by a Cox proportional hazards model (stratified by chemotherapy regimen and PD-L1 expression, each stratum defines separate baseline hazard function); ties handled by replacing the proportional hazards model by the discrete logistic model; 95% CI for the hazard ratio will be calculated. Kaplan-Meier estimates and associated statistics (PFS rates at 6, 9, 12; median PFS) and corresponding 95% CI will be presented by treatment group.

Time frame
Time from consent to the date of first documentation of objective progressive disease assessed by RECIST 1.1 or death, assessed at 6, 9, and 12 months
2

Overall survival

Estimation of the treatment effect by a Cox proportional hazards model (stratified by chemotherapy regimen and PD-L1 expression, each stratum defines separate baseline hazard function); ties handled by replacing the proportional hazards model by the discrete logistic model; 95% CI for the hazard ratio will be calculated. Kaplan-Meier estimates and associated statistics and corresponding 95% CI will be presented by treatment group.

Time frame
Time from consent to the date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years
3

New metastasis free survival

Any new lesions different from the ones present at screening are considered as new metastases.

Time frame
Time from consent to the date of the first documentation of a new distant metastasis or death, assessed up to 2 years
4

Quantitative and qualitative markers of planning and treatment resource utilization

Develop real-world clinical and treatment planning workflows for implementation of the Ethos platform for anatomic and biologically adaptive radiation therapy (RT).

Time frame
Up to 2 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Varian Medical Systems

Collaborator