About this trial
Refractory/Relapsed (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with a dis-mal prognosis.
In some subsets of AML such as AML driven by the t(8;21) translocation, leading to the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 (AML1-ETO) fusion transcript expression, CD19 B-cell antigen is aberrantly expressed on malignant blasts in around 80 % of cases. Interestingly, the expression of the CD19 antigen is also detected in the CD34+ CD38-population leukemic stem cells.
t(8;21) AML subtype has a rather good prognosis with an intensive chemotherapy regimen, but relapses occur in around 40 % of the patients and new therapeutic options are needed for these patients.
Plesa et al, reported a successful treatment of a refractory t(8;21) AML with bispecific monoclonal antibodies that targets CD19. More recently, Danylesko et al, have reported long-term remission following CD19 CAR-T cells in a heavily pre-treated patient with t(8;21) AML(1). The same group has just submitted an abstract of 6 treated patients to the European Haematology Association (EHA) 2023 meet-ing: Six patients (adults-5, child-1) with t(8; 21) AML (confirmed by cytogenetic and FISH) and aberrant CD19 expression were included. One patient had a complex karyotype. Molecular analysis for CKIT, NPM1, IDH1, IDH2, and CBPa were nega-tive in all pts. One pt harbors the FLT3 ITD and TKD mutations. Median number of previous chemotherapy (CT) lines was 4 (3-8). Four patients were with chemo re-sistant relapse post allo-HCT (MSD-1, 10/10 MUD -3) 5-18 months before CAR T-cell infusion. All patients developed CRS (grade 1-3) and were treated with i.v tocili-zumab and dexamethasone. 2/6 patients suffered from ICANS and were treated with steroids. In 4/6 patients, day 28 BM aspiration disclosed normal hematopoie-sis with no excess blasts and lack of t(8;21) by FISH confirming clinical and cyto-genetic remission, while 2/6 pts with progressive AML had no response (Danylesko etal. Abstract EHA 2023, submitted).
Interestingly, other subsets of AML display an aberrant expression of CD19. These observations indicate that CD19 can be a target of choice for CAR-T cells in patients with R/R AML expressing this antigen.
In this study, we plan to offer anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy to patients with re-lapsed/refractory AML expressing CD19 for whom no curative alternatives are available.
To this end, CAR-T cells will be manufactured using closed semi-automated bioreactor CliniMACS Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec) in academic setting.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form,
Patient with AML that expresses CD19 by Flow-cytometry, (CD19 expression ≥ 70% of AML blasts)
Primary refractory: absence of remission after two courses of induction chemotherapy,
Secondary refractory: absence of remission after salvage treatment in relapsing patients,
Disqualifiers
Patient unable to sign the informed consent,
Patient with R/R AML that does not expresses CD19,
History of malignancy other than nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ (e.g. cervix, bladder, breast) unless disease-free and without anticancer therapy for at least 3 years,
Prior CD19 targeted therapy,
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
CAR-T cell therapy
Drugcyclophosphamide and fludarabin conditioning , followed by a target dose of 1 x 10exp6 of autologous, genetically modified, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells per kg of body weight.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Number of patients deceased without progression one month after CAR-T cell infusion
Non-progression mortality (NPM), type and frequency of adverse events. NPM is defined as death occurred in patients without evidence of AML progression. Absence of response, progression or relapse of AML define progression status
Secondary outcomes
Number of patients with manufacturing failure and out of specification (OOS) deviation
Duration of CAR-T cell persistence in blood after infusion evaluated by flow-cytometry and PCR,
Number of patients with overall response
Response duration
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University Hospital, Lille
Lead sponsor
Ministry of Health, France
Collaborator
University Hospital, Rouen
Collaborator
Miltenyi
Collaborator