Testing the Combination of Nivolumab and ASTX727 for Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase I trial tests the safety, side effects, and best dose of nivolumab in combination with ASTX727 in treating B-cell lymphoma that has come back (relapsed) or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. ASTX727 consists of the combination of decitabine and cedazuridine. Cedazuridine is in a class of medications called cytidine deaminase inhibitors. It prevents the breakdown of decitabine, making it more available in the body so that decitabine will have a greater effect. Decitabine is in a class of medications called hypomethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells in the bone marrow. Giving nivolumab in combination with ASTX727 may shrink and stabilize cancer.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Dose Escalation: Histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory B cell lymphoma (non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL] or Hodgkin lymphoma [HL])

Dose Expansion: Patients must have histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory DLBCL or HL

Patients with DLBCL must have failed at least first line chemotherapy and must be transplant ineligible (either secondary to performance status or lack of adequate disease control or patient preference). Patients may be relapsed after autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT), or after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy

In dose escalation patients with HL or B cell NHL other than DLBCL must have relapsed after at least 2 lines of therapy and have no other curative options left. HL patients must be brentuximab vedotin refractory or intolerant. In dose expansion, patients with classic HL must have relapsed after at least 2 lines of therapy, and had autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), be ineligible for ASCT, or have refused ASCT. Prior treatment with checkpoint inhibitor is allowed

Disqualifiers

Repeat imaging demonstrates no new sites of bone metastases

The lesion being considered for palliative radiation is not a target lesion

Patients who have not recovered from adverse events due to prior anti-cancer therapy (i.e., have residual toxicities > grade 1) with the exception of alopecia

Patients who have had prior treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or anti CTLA4 antibodies and were permanently discontinued from further treatment because of an adverse event. All other prior therapies are permissible. Prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy is allowed if there was no discontinuation due to adverse event

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo collection of blood samples

  • Computed Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

  • Decitabine and Cedazuridine

    Drug

    Given PO

  • Nivolumab

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given IV

  • Positron Emission Tomography

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo PET/CT

Treatment groups

32 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Treatment (nivolumab, decitabine and cedazuridine)Experimental treatment 5 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Incidence of adverse events

Frequency of subjects experiencing toxicities will be tabulated. Toxicities will be assessed and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 terminology. Exact 95% confidence intervals around the toxicity proportions will be calculated.

Time frame
Up to 2 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Complete response rate

Will be reported along with the 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
2

Partial response rate

Will be reported along with the 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
3

Overall response rate

Will be reported along with the 95% confidence intervals.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
4

Duration of response

Will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Greenwood's formula will be used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Time frame
Up to 2 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.