The Safety and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastatic Adenocarcinoma

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 1
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-75
SponsorGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital

About this trial

This research is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical trial aimed at assessing the standard pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) utilizing a novel nebulized drug delivery system (NDDS) for patients with peritoneal metastatic adenocarcinoma (PMA) originating from gastric, colorectal, appendiceal, or ovarian cancer.

The primary objectives of this study are to assess the safety and efficacy of PIPAC with the novel NDDS in the treatment of PMA. Primary endpoints include adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs, as assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0, incidences of device defects, postoperative pain scores evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale / Score (VAS), and quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, Version 3.0). Secondary endpoints include the intra-abdominal peritoneal cancer index (PCI), peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS), objective response rate (including partial response (PR) and complete response (CR)), improvement in ascites, conversion rate (patients proceeding to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following initial PIPAC treatments), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Histopathology verified that peritoneal metastatic adenocarcinoma (PMA) arises from gastric, colorectal, appendiceal, or ovarian carcinoma;

Applicable to individuals of either sex, aged between 18 and 75 years;

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale ≤ 2;

Absence of other concurrent malignancies;

Disqualifiers

Presenting symptoms of gastrointestinal obstruction;

Fully reliant on parenteral nutrition;

Exhibiting decompensated ascites;

Suffering from severe abdominal infection (indications of peritonitis);

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy

    Drug

    The comprehensive therapeutic strategy will be modified based on the integrated 2- or 3-week systemic chemotherapies. In the interim, a total of three PIPAC procedures will be conducted for all qualifying patients. 1. PIPAC combined with 2-week systemic chemotherapies: PIPAC therapy will occur every four weeks, while systemic chemotherapies will be administered during the first and third weeks following the initial and second PIPAC procedures respectively. 2. PIPAC combined with 3-week systemic chemotherapies: (1) Scheme 1: PIPAC therapy will occur every 6 weeks, with systemic chemotherapies administered during the 1st and 4th weeks following the first and second PIPAC procedures, respectively. (2) Scheme 2: PIPAC therapy will occur every 6 weeks, while systemic chemotherapies will be administered in the 2nd and 5th weeks following the initial and second PIPAC procedures, respectively.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)Experimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Adverse Events (AE) and serious AE associated with Treatment

Treatment-related adverse events are categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 5.0). Elevated grades correlate with increased severity of adverse events

Time frame
4-6 weeks following the initial and secondary PIPAC procedures, and 6 months subsequent to the tertiary PIPAC procedure
2

Incidences of device defects

Incidences of device defects during PIPAC therapy

Time frame
During each PIPAC therapy
3

Postoperative pain scores

Postoperative pain is assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale/Score (VAS), which integrates the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale Revision (FPS-R) and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Scores vary from 0 to 10, with 1-3 indicating "mild pain (sleep unaffected)", 4-6 indicating "moderate pain (sleep disruption)", and 7-10 indicating "severe pain (severe sleep disruption)".

Time frame
The first to seventh day after the PIPAC procedure
4

Quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Version 3.0)

The quality of life is assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 scale, Version 3.0). A higher comprehensive score indicates superior quality of life.

Time frame
4-6 weeks following the initial and second PIPAC procedures, and 6 months subsequent to the third PIPAC procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

Intra-abdominal peritoneal cancer index (PCI)

The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) is assessed based on the presence and dimensions of peritoneal metastases in various areas of the abdominal cavity. Elevated PCI scores indicate a greater peritoneal tumor burden.

Time frame
During each PIPAC procedure
2

Peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS)

The peritoneal regression grading score is assessed through the pathological examination of biopsies from the four quadrants (right upper/lower and left upper/lower) of the anterior abdominal wall, correlating with the ratio of residual active to necrotic tumor cells. The grading scores span from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating fewer residual active tumor cells.

Time frame
During each PIPAC procedure
3

Objective response rate (partial and complete response)

The objective response rate, encompassing both partial and complete responses, is assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1)

Time frame
Within 6 months after the third PIPAC procedure
4

Improvement in ascites

The volume and hue of ascites are documented and assessed

Time frame
During each PIPAC procedure

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Lead sponsor

Tianjin Third Central Hospital

Collaborator

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Collaborator

Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Collaborator

Henan Cancer Hospital

Collaborator

Tongji Hospital

Collaborator

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Collaborator

Jiangxi Provincial Cancer Hospital

Collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medicial University

Collaborator

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Collaborator

Southern Medical University, China

Collaborator

Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University

Collaborator

Ruijin Hospital

Collaborator

Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Collaborator

West China Hospital

Collaborator

Tianjin Nankai Hospital

Collaborator

Wannan Medical College Yijishan Hospital

Collaborator

Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Collaborator

Changzhi People's Hospital

Collaborator

First Hospital of China Medical University

Collaborator

Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Collaborator

Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Collaborator

Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center

Collaborator

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Collaborator