" Study of the Benefit of Nebulized Amikacin in the Treatment of Gram-negative Bacillus Pneumonia Acquired During Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Veno-arterial Oxygenation "

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

About this trial

Pneumonia are the most frequent infectious complication in patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Veno-arterial (ECMO-VA), with a treatment failure rate of around 40%, even though antibiotic therapy is tailored to the germs identified. One hypothesis to explain this particularly high failure rate is the reduced pulmonary blood flow associated with ECMO offloading of the heart. Although there are no data to date on the pulmonary penetration of antibiotics in patients undergoing VA-ECMO, this phenomenon of pulmonary hypoperfusion could contribute to altering the alveolocapillary diffusion of antibiotics, thereby reducing their concentration in the pulmonary parenchyma.

Our hypothesis is that amikacin nebulization could increase bacterial clearance and, ultimately, limit treatment failure or recurrence of gram-negative bacilli (GNB) pneumonia in patients undergoing VA-ECMO.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patient 18 years or older

Circulatory assistance by veno-arterial ECMO for at least 24 hours prior to documentation of pneumonia

Invasive mechanical ventilation

Diagnostic suspicion of pneumonia based on evocative criteria (presence of at least 2 of the following criteria): fever (superior to 38. 5°C), hypothermia (inferior to 36.0°C), hyperleukocytosis (superior to 11 × 10^9 l-1) or leukopenia (inferior to 4 × 10^9 l-1), purulent tracheobronchial secretions, altered oxygenation with need to increase FiO2 on ECMO or ventilator for the same SaO2 or PaO2 target, new or persistent pulmonary infiltrate(s) on chest x-ray in bed, or image suggestive of pneumonia on chest CT, or consolidation of appearance suggestive of an infectious origin on pulmonary ultrasound.

Disqualifiers

Known allergy to amikacin or another aminoglycoside or to an auxiliary drug or to any of their excipients.

Contraindication to the administration of amikacin or its excipients listed in the summary of product characteristics.

Contraindication to the administration of an auxiliary drug or to one of its excipients listed in the summary of product characteristics.

Contraindications to nebulization

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Amikacin

    Drug

    Patients included in the inhaled amikacin group will receive inhaled antibiotic therapy by nebulization of amikacin at a dose of 25 mg/kg in 1 daily dose (+/- 3 hours apart), within 6 hours of randomization and for a total duration of 5 days.

  • Standard of care

    Drug

    Patients included in the standard of care group will not receive any nebulization. They will receive Standard care alone.

Treatment groups

26 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Amikacine nebulization associated with Standard of careExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Standard of careActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Bacterial eradication rate

Bacterial eradication rate, defined as absence of germs on direct examination and negative culture of a tracheal aspirate taken on day 5 (D5) after randomization and at least 12 hours after the last administration of inhaled amikacin.

Time frame
Day 5

Secondary outcomes

1

Clinical cure rate

Clinical cure rate, defined as disappearance of clinical signs suggestive of pneumonia, biological inflammatory syndrome and correction of haematosis disorders, at D5.

Time frame
Day 5
2

Pneumonia persistence rate

Pneumonia persistence rate defined as the presence of the pathogen identified at a significant level on culture of tracheal aspirate at D5.

Time frame
Day 5
3

Change in clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS)

Difference between CPIS score at D5 and CPIS score at randomization.

Time frame
Day 0 to Day 5
4

Change in pulmonary aeration score

Difference between ultrasound pulmonary aeration score at D5 and pulmonary aeration score at randomization.

Time frame
Day 0 to Day 5

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.