About this trial
This study will examine the potential efficacy and safety of Rett-T for core motor deficits of Rett syndrome, and will explore biological markers of safety and treatment response.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Female outpatients 2-21 years of age inclusive.
Diagnosis of Rett syndrome.
At least partially ambulatory (may need assistive device to take a step).
If already receiving stable concomitant medications or nutraceuticals affecting behaviour, must be on a stable dose during the preceding 1 month prior to Screening (with the exception of fluoxetine, where a period of 6 weeks is needed), and will not electively initiate new or modify ongoing medications for study duration.
Disqualifiers
Pregnant females; sexually active females on inadequate birth control (extremely unlikely in this population).
Have another serious medical condition that, based on Investigator judgment, might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound interpretation of the study results, or endanger their own well-being. Have evidence or history of malignancy or any significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular (including any rhythm disorder), respiratory, renal, hepatic, or gastrointestinal disease, not including mild common pediatric diseases in these areas that are stable (e.g. mild asthma, constipation, etc.).
Have hypersensitivity to any components of Rett-T.
Have one or more of the following: HIV, HBV, HCV, hemophilia (bleeding problems, recent nose and brain injuries), drug abuse, immunity disorder, major depressive episode or psychosis.
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Rett-T
Drugantioxidant cocktail
Placebo
Other interventionPlacebo
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Rett Syndrome Natural History Motor Behavior Assessment (MBA)
To examine the effect of Rett-T vs. placebo on measures of motor function. The Rett Syndrome MBA consists of 37 items grouped into three subscales (Behavioral/Social Assessment, Orofacial Respiratory Assessment, and Motor Assessment/Physical Signs). Items are captured on a 0-4 point Likert scale. Total and subscale scores are calculated (subscales are summed for a total score). The scale range for Total score is 0-136; for Behavioral/Social subscale, 0-60; for Orofacial/Respiratory subscale, 0-28; for Motor Assesment/Physical Signs, 0-48. For both total and subscale scores, higher values represent a worse outcome.
Secondary outcomes
Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale (RSGMS)
To examine the effect of Rett-T vs. placebo on measures of motor function. The RSGMS consists of 15 gross motor items grouped into three subscales (Sitting, Standing and Walking, and Challenge). Items are captured on a 0-3 Likert Scale rating regarding level of assistance needed (0=maximal, 3 = none). Total and subscale scores are calculated (subscales are summed for a total score). The scale range for Total score is 0-45; for Sitting, 0-9; for Walking, 0-27; for Challenge, 0-9. For both total and subscale scores, higher values represent a better outcome.
Safety Monitoring Uniform Report Form (SMURF)
To examine the safety and tolerability of Rett- T in children and youth with Rett syndrome; To explore the effect Rett-T vs. placebo on maladaptive behaviors, anxiety, sleep, seizure
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement Scale - Global (CGI-I)
To explore the effect of Rett-T vs. placebo on global improvement. The CGI-I measures global clinical improvement in response to treatment. A single score is assigned on a 1-7 Likert scale, with 1= very much improved-7=very much worse. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
The Top 3 Causes for Concern
To explore the effect Rett-T vs. placebo on maladaptive behaviors, anxiety, sleep, seizure frequency, and global improvement. Respondents are instructed to choose their top three concerns for the participant, and indicate Concern Number #1, 2 and 3 on the form. Respondents are next instructed to place a vertical mark along a visual analogue scale (a 10 centimetre horizontal line in which the leftmost point on the scale indicates the concern is completely absent, and the rightmost point on the scale indicates that the concern is very severe). For each concern, a measurement is taken from the leftmost point of the scale to the vertical mark, and the measurement in centimetres acts as the score. Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Lead sponsor
Ontario Brain Institute
Collaborator
Unity Health Toronto
Collaborator