A Study of Weight Loss Intervention With Tirzepatide and Progestin Intrauterine Device to Treat Endometrial Hyperplasia and Grade 1 Endometrial Cancer

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18+
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase II trial studies whether adding tirzepatide injections to a levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) improves pathologic response (absence of cancer cells in tissue samples after treatment) in women with endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN) or grade 1 endometrial cancer who are overweight or obese. Endometrial cancer occurrence has continued to rise in the United States. Over half of endometrial cancer cases are thought to be attributable to being overweight and obese, and the risk relationship appears to be weight dependent. AH/EIN is a precancerous condition of the endometrium (the uterus or womb) where the lining of the uterus grows abnormally thick, and the cells become abnormal. Women with this thickening have a higher-than-average risk of developing endometrial cancer if left untreated. The usual approach for patients who have AH/EIN and grade 1 endometrial cancer is the removal of the uterus. While surgical treatment is generally safe and effective, it may not be the best approach for some patients. The LNG-IUD is a small, T-shaped device inserted into the uterus that releases the hormone levonorgestrel, a progestin, which counteracts the effects of estrogen in the endometrium. Tirzepatide is a dual glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonist which has been shown to drive weight loss. Adding tirzepatide injections to LNG-IUD may help overweight or obese women with AH-EIN or grade 1 endometrial cancer lose weight, which may improve pathologic response.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Women who have a pathologic diagnosis of AH/EIN or grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer confirmed on dilation and curettage (D&C) and desire non-surgical management, who are overweight (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 27 kg/m²) with a weight-related comorbidity (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, or high cholesterol) or obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²) with or without weight-related comorbidities

Prior progesterone treatment for conditions other than AH/EIN or endometrial cancer is allowed, but a 28-day washout period is required before levonorgestrel IUD placement. If archival tissue is available from prior to any progesterone treatment but after the diagnosis of AH/EIN/EC, the washout period is not needed

Age ≥ 18 years. Because no dosing or adverse event (AE) data are currently available on the use of tirzepatide in participants < 18 years of age, children and adolescents < 18 years of age are excluded from this study but will be eligible for future pediatric trials, if applicable

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥ 60%)

Disqualifiers

Women with grade 2-3 endometrioid, or women with serous, clear cell, mucinous, squamous, transitional cell, sarcomas, or carcinosarcoma histology

Evidence of extrauterine spread of disease on imaging or during surgical evaluation

Participants may not be receiving any other investigational agents or anticancer therapies (including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonal, or antibody-based therapy). Prior treatment should have a minimum washout period of 14 days

History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to the levonorgestrel IUD or any GLP-1 agonist

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Medical Device Usage and Evaluation

    Other intervention

    Undergo LNG-IUD placement

  • Tirzepatide

    Drug

    Given SC

Treatment groups

55 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Prevention (LNG-IUD, tirzepatide)Experimental treatment 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Weighted pathological complete response (pCR)

Proportion of pCR at 26 weeks among patients receiving combined treatment with tirzepatide and levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) compared to historical controls who received LNG-IUD alone.

Time frame
At 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportion of participants who achieve pCR on endometrial biopsy

Will be compared to historical controls.

Time frame
At 52 weeks
2

Time to complete response and duration of response

Will be compared to historical controls.

Time frame
Up to 52 weeks
3

Rate of hyperplasia persistence and progression to EC

Will be compared to historical controls as assessed by standard pathologic criteria.

Time frame
At 26 and 52 weeks
4

Percent change in cell proliferation

Will assess Ki67 within pre-treatment biopsy and post-treatment biopsies. Will also compare with historical controls.

Time frame
At baseline and 12, 26, 39, and 52 weeks

Other outcomes

1

Change in the endometrial immune microenvironment

Changes pre- and post-treatment will be assessed.

Time frame
At baseline and 12, 26, 39, and 52 weeks
2

Change in systemic inflammation and metabolic markers

Will summarize percent changes from baseline.

Time frame
At baseline and 12, 26, 39 and 52 weeks
3

Weight-independent effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 on cell proliferation (Ki-67+)

Time frame
At baseline and 12, 26, 39 and 52 weeks
4

Effect of intervention on treatment response

Will evaluate the effect of the intervention (combined treatment of tirzepatide and levonorgestrel intrauterine device) on treatment response.

Time frame
At 26 and 52 weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: