About this trial
The purpose of this protocol is to evaluate the efficacy of MK-8690 in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. The primary hypothesis is that MK-8690 is superior to placebo with respect to the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Modified Mayo Score at Week 12.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Has had ulcerative colitis (UC) (from onset of symptoms) for at least 3 months before Randomization
Has moderately to severely active UC
Has a weight ≥40 kg
Satisfies at least 1 of the criteria: Has had an inadequate response or loss of response to 1 or more protocol-specified treatments; protocol specified corticosteroid dependence; has been intolerant to 1 or more protocol-specified UC treatments
Disqualifiers
Has a diagnosis of Crohn's Disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-undefined) or other types of colitis or enteritis that may confound efficacy assessment
Has a current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon
Has UC limited to the rectum
Has a current or impending need for colostomy or ileostomy
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
MK-8690
DrugSolution for subcutaneous injection
Placebo
Other interventionSolution for subcutaneous injection
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Per Modified Mayo Score (MMS) at Week 12
The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: Endoscopic subscore (ES), scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); Stool frequency subscore (SFS), scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS), scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical Remission is defined as an ES of 0 or 1 with no friability, RBS of 0, and SFS of 0 or 1 and not greater than the baseline SFS.
Secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who experience an AE will be reported.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Intervention Due to an AE
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study intervention. The percentage of participants who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response Per MMS at Week 12
The MMS is a composite score of UC disease activity on a scale of increasing severity from 0-9, calculated by summing three subscores: ES, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 3 (severe disease, such as spontaneous bleeding or ulceration); SFS, scored on a scale of increasing frequency from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (≥5 stools more than normal per day for the participant); and RBS, scored on a scale of increasing severity from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). Clinical response is defined as an MMS reduction of 2 or more points and 30% or more from baseline, plus a reduction of 1 or more points in RBS or an absolute RBS of 0 or 1.
Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 12
Endoscopic improvement is defined as ES of 0 or 1 with no friability. The ES measures UC severity based on endoscopy on a 0-3 scale of increasing severity.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.