A Trial Comparing Three Different Treatment Options for Adults With Low-Risk Myelodysplasia and Anemia (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)

About this trial

This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial tests luspatercep with or without epoetin alfa or emavusertib for the treatment of low risk myelodysplasia and anemia. Biological therapies, such as luspatercep, use substances made from living organisms that may attack specific cancer cells and stop them from growing or kill them. Epoetin alfa is a substance that is made in the laboratory and stimulates the bone marrow to make red blood cells. Emavusertib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving luspatercep with or without epoetin alfa or emavusertib may be effective for treating patients with low risk myelodysplasia and anemia.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Participants must have been registered to Master Screening and Re-Assessment Protocol (MYELOMATCH) prior to consenting to this study. Participants must have been assigned to this clinical trial, via MATCHBox Protocol Assignment Team, prior to registration to this study. Participants must have agreed to have specimens submitted for translational medicine and must be offered the opportunity to submit biosamples for banking for future research as per MYELOMATCH

Participants must have pathologically confirmed MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 classification, without excess blasts

Lower risk MDS with a revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) score of less than or equal to 3.5

Symptomatic anemia defined as either red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent, or hemoglobin < 95 g/L with subjective fatigue or dyspnea

Disqualifiers

Participants with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen are eligible for this trial

MDS with del(5q)

Concurrent use of hematopoietic growth factors (other than protocol specified)

Known hypersensitivity to either luspatercept, erythropoietin, or emavusertib therapy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Biospecimen Collection

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo blood sample collection

  • Bone Marrow Aspiration

    Procedure/Surgery

    Undergo bone marrow aspiration

  • Emavusertib

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given PO

  • Epoetin Alfa

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given SC

  • Luspatercept

    Biological/Vaccine

    Given SC

Treatment groups

270 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Arm 1 (Luspatercept)Experimental treatment 3 interventions
Group B: Arm 2 (Luspatercept with epoetin alfa)Experimental treatment 4 interventions
Group C: Arm 3 (Luspatercept and emavusertib)Experimental treatment 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Erythroid response rate

Defined by the total number of patients with hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) response divided by the total number of randomized patients in each arm. The comparison of the HI-E rate will be done using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified for the stratification factors at randomization based on the intent-to-treat population. The difference in the response rates and the corresponding one-sided 90% confidence limit will be calculated.

Time frame
At 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

1

Transfusion free survival

Defined as from achieving transfusion independence to the first day of transfusions after becoming transfusion dependent as defined by International Working Group (IWG) 2018 criteria for those who are transfusion dependent at enrollment or time to first day of transfusions as defined by IWG 2018 criteria for those nor transfusion dependent at enrollment.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
2

Duration of erythroid response

Time frame
From meeting criteria for HI-E response to progression or relapse as defined by IWG 2018 criteria, up to 2 years
3

Tri-lineage response

Tri-lineage response involves erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet response per IWG 2018 criteria.

Time frame
Up to 2 years
4

Bi-lineage response

Any two of the responses for erythroid, neutrophil, and platelet response per IWG 2018 criteria.

Time frame
Up to 2 years

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: