Aclarubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age65+
SponsorShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

About this trial

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that result from clonal proliferation of mature post-thymic lymphocytes. These T-cell neoplasms account for approximately 10-15% of all lymphomas. The most common subtype of PTCL is classified as "not otherwise specified" (NOS) which accounts for 30-40%.

PTCLs have been treated similarly with CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone), often with etoposide (CHOEP), followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission. However, \<50% of the patients are cured with CHOP alone, and the progression-free survival rates at 5 years are as low as 20% for PTCLs. Meanwhile, for elderly patients who can't endure CHOPE and proceed ASCT, the long-term survival is even worse.

Aclarubicin is an anthracycline which showed good safety profile in the treatment of both myeloid and lymphocytic leukemia. Previous studies have shown that aclarubicin only induces histone eviction without causing DNA damage, and it stands out in pre-clinical models and clinical studies, as it potently kills AML cells. Meanwhile, aclarubicin lacks cardiotoxicity, and can be safely administered even after the maximum cumulative dose of either doxorubicin or idarubicin has been reached.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of Aclarubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CAOP) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PTCLs. The investigators hope to try to replace doxorubicin in CHOP with aclarubicin, which is less toxic, without reducing the efficacy of patients while ensuring safety.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form

Age ≥ 65 years at enrollment

ECOG performance status score ≤ 2

Able to comply with the research visit plan and other protocol requirements

Disqualifiers

Mental illness, disability, or social circumstances that may affect participant safety, ability to provide informed consent, or poor adherence

Other types of lymphoma

Previous immunotherapy or chemotherapy for PTCL, excluding those who used corticosteroids (≤8 days) prior to enrollment

Previous radiotherapy for PTCL, excluding those confined to a single lymph node region

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Aclarubicin

    Drug

    20mg/m\^2/D, D1-4, QD, ivgtt

  • Cyclophosphamide

    Drug

    750 mg/m\^2, D1, ivgtt

  • Vincristine

    Drug

    1.4 mg/m\^2, D1 (maximum 2mg/d), IV

  • Prednisone

    Drug

    60 mg/m\^2, D1-5 (maximum 100mg/d), Po

Treatment groups

36 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: CAOPExperimental treatment 4 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Complete remission rate (CR)

Proportion of enrolled subjects who achieved CR after receiving up to 6 cycles of the CAOP regimen

Time frame
After a maximum of 6 cycles of CAOP regimen (each cycle is 28 days)

Secondary outcomes

1

Progression Free Survival

The time from enrollment to confirmed disease progression or death from any cause.

Time frame
Maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
2

Overall Survival

The time from enrollment to death from any cause.

Time frame
maximum follow-up period is 2 years after the end of treatment.
3

Adverse Events

Adverse Events (CTCAE v6.0), Vital Signs and Physical Examination, ECOG, Clinical Laboratory Tests, Electrocardiogram (ECG), Echocardiography, Cardiac Enzyme Profile

Time frame
From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment
4

Change in quality of life as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status score

Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The global health status score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Scores will be calculated according to the EORTC scoring manual and summarized as change from baseline.

Time frame
From enrollment to 28 days after the end of treatment

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Lead sponsor

Leiden University Medical Center

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: