About this trial
This phase II trial compares the safety and effectiveness of 89Zr-DFO-GmAb positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) compared to contrast-enhanced CT after surgery in detecting clear cell renal cell cancer that has come back (recurrent). For some patients, the risk of recurrence after surgery remains high. Conventional CT methods, such as contrast-enhanced CT, may not detect small volume or micrometastatic disease. PET/CT with radiotracers, such as 89Zr-DFO-GmAb, may improve detection of tumor cells. Girentuximab (GmAb), a monoclonal antibody, is tagged with zirconium-89, a radioactive atom (which is also known as an isotope). The zirconium-89 (89Zr) isotope is attached to girentuximab with desferrioxamine (DFO) and this combined product is called 89Zr-DFO-girentuximab. 89Zr-DFO-girentuximab attaches itself to a protein on the surface of clear cell renal cell tumor cells called CAIX. PET is an established imaging technique that utilizes small amounts of radioactivity attached to very minimal amounts of tracer, in the case of this research, 89Zr-DFO-GmAb. Because some cancers, including clear cell renal cell cancer, take up 89Zr-DFO-GmAb it can be seen with PET. CT utilizes x-rays that traverse body from the outside. CT images provide an exact outline of organs and potential inflammatory tissue where it occurs in patient's body. Using contrast agents with CT scan to enhance the images (contrast-enhanced CT) is standard of care imaging. 89Zr-DFO-GmAb PET/CT may be safe and effective compared to contrast-enhanced CT in detecting recurrent clear cell renal cell cancer after surgery.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age ≥ 18
Histologically confirmed clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (ccRCC) (based on partial/radical nephrectomy/metastasectomy)
For tumors with extensive sarcomatoid features, if there is evidence of areas of clear cell and high CAIX expression throughout the tumor on immunohistochemistry, they will be allowed on study
Subjects must have undergone definitive treatment of their primary tumor (partial/radical nephrectomy) +/- resection of metastatic disease to no evidence of disease (NED) with a prior nephrectomy < 2 years)
Disqualifiers
Inability to provide written informed consent
Any evidence of residual disease or known metastasis at the time of planned 89Zr-DFO-GmAb administration
Prior post-operative imaging for confirmation of disease status
Low risk prostate cancer on active surveillance (National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN] very low/low risk)
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
Biospecimen Collection
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo blood sample collection
Bone Scan
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo bone scan
Computed Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo CT, PET/CT, and CT of the brain
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo MRI of the brain
Positron Emission Tomography
Procedure/SurgeryUndergo PET/CT
Questionnaire Administration
Other interventionAncillary studies
Zirconium Zr 89 Girentuximab
DrugGiven IV
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Lesion detection rate
Patients will be treated as binary categorization as follows: (i) Patients who have ≥ 1 lesion confirmed to be recurrent disease will be designated positive (recurrence). (ii) Patients with no lesions detected will be designated negative (no recurrence). The analysis of the primary objective will utilize McNemar's test to compare the detection rate between the imaging techniques.
Secondary outcomes
Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
The total number of AEs will be summarized with grade and attribution. The total number of significant AEs will be summarized with attribution if present. AEs will be descriptive in nature and only counts and percentage will be reported.
Positive predictive value (PPV)
Will compare PPV of 89Zr-DFO-GmAb PET/CT in subjects designated as having a suspicious lesion on the BICR PET/CT evaluation, will review follow up for available lesion validation by 1) histopathology (biopsy/resection), 2) evidence of growth under surveillance or 3) reduction of size under treatment, and 4) unequivocal confirmation of malignancy on a different imaging modality. As there are no firm estimates to the number of lesions that will be designated as suspicious, there are no planned statistical analyses planned. Would present the total number of cases and the frequency of validation with the 95% confidence interval.
Recurrence-free survival
Recurrence-free survival will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Method with date and evidence of recurrence based on either clinical annotation by the treating physician or documentation of recurrence by diagnostic imaging or histopathology. Analysis will be descriptive and provide an estimated 2-year recurrence-free survival with 95% confidence interval. A Log-rank test will compare the differences in recurrence-free survival between groups.
Change in management and perceived clinical utility of the unblinded read/report of positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (PET/CT)
Questionnaires using Likert scores will be used to determine changes. Analysis will be descriptive.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead sponsor
Telix Pharmaceuticals (Innovations) Pty Limited
Collaborator