Assess Efficacy of a Nanodiamond Periprocedural Skin Care Regimen for Ablative Resurfacing

ConditionSkin Laxity
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age35-70
SponsorGoldman, Butterwick, Fitzpatrick and Groff

About this trial

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Pavise Extracellular Matrix Restore (ECMR), compared with standard acute post-operative care, when used as the primary occlusive treatment immediately following ablative CO₂ and Er:YAG facial laser resurfacing to support wound healing.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Males or females in good general health age 35-70 years of age.

Subjects with score Moderate to Severe (Class II-III, Score 4-9) on the Fitzpatrick-Goldman Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis Scale (Appendix E)

Subjects with score Moderate to Severe facial photodamage as assessed by the Modified Griffth's Scale (Appendix F)

Fitzpatrick skin types I-III.

Disqualifiers

Pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the course of the study, or breastfeeding.

Prescence of an active bacterial, fungal, or viral infection in the treatment area.

Significant history or current evidence of a medical, psychological or other condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude enrollment into the study.

Use of any topical products containing tretinoins or derivatives, alpha-hydroxy acids, salicylic acid, and vitamins C or E (includes derivatives thereof) on the face within 14 days prior to or during the study period, other than the study products.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pavise Serum

    Drug

    Pavise ECMR (extracellular matrix restore) serum regimen combined with laser treatment

  • Sham Comparator

    Drug

    Vehicle serum regimen combined with laser treatment

  • Co2/Er:YAG

    Device

    Ablative laser resurfacing treatment

Treatment groups

8 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Group ASham comparator 2 interventions
Group B: Group BActive comparator 2 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Investigator Evaluation of Erythema, Edema, Exudation and Crusting

Circle one for Perioral Area: Erythema: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Edema: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Crusting: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Exudation: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Circle one for Periorbital Area: Erythema: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Edema: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Crusting: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Exudation: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe

Time frame
Day of procedure, post day 1, post day 4, post day 7, post day 14

Secondary outcomes

1

Fitzpatrick Goldman Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis Scale

Circle One: 1. Fine wrinkles with mild elastosis 2. Fine to moderate wrinkles with moderate elastosis 3. Fine to deep wrinkles with severe elastosis

Time frame
Screening, Baseline, 3 month visit
2

Tolerability Assessment by the Investigator

Circle One: Erythema 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Edema: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe Dryness: 0= None 1. Mild 2. Moderate 3. Pronounced 4. Severe

Time frame
Day of procedure, post day 1, post day 4, post day 7, post day 14, 3 month visit
3

Subject Self Assessment Questionnaire

Rate from 0-10 for each of the following questions where 0 is no pain and 10 is excruciating pain 1. Pain 2. Itching 3. Tightness 4. Oozing 5. Crusting

Time frame
Day of procedure, post day 1, post day 4, post day 7, post day 14, 3 month visit
4

Subject Healing Questionnaire

Circle One 1. Study product supported my healing post procedure Strongly Agree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 2. Study product reduces irritation Strongly Agree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 3. Study product was not irritating or painful to apply Strongly Agree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 4. I was satisfied with my recovery/progression Strongly Agree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Time frame
post day 1, post day 4, post day 7, post day 14

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: