Cross-over Study on the Influence of Fampridine on Working Memory in Mild to Moderate Depression

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-55
SponsorUniversity of Basel

About this trial

Cognitive deficits, including working memory deficits, are often present in depression and there are currently no effective pharmacological treatments targeting working memory deficits. Papassotiropoulos et al. (2024) has recently demonstrated that fampridine, a potassium channel blocker, can enhance working memory in healthy individuals with lower baseline performance, suggesting it may hold potential for addressing cognitive deficits in clinical populations. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether fampridine improves working memory performance in mild to moderate depression

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Male or female

Major depressive episode confirmed by the Mini-DIPS. Currently mild to moderate (MADRS: 7-30).

Normotensive (BP: 90/60mmHg - 140/90mmHg). Sufficiently treated hypertensive subjects will be included.

BMI: 19 - 34,9 kg/m2

Disqualifiers

Contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to 4-aminopyridine

Use of potassium channel blockers within the last 3 months

Treatment with OCT 2 inhibitors and -substrates (e.g. cimetidine, propranolol)

Treatment with antidepressants or antipsychotics within the last 3 months and throughout the study period

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Fampridine SR

    Drug

    Active study medication consists of 15 tablets of fampridine SR 10 mg formulated for oral administration taken in the morning and evening 12 h apart without food. Tablets must be administered whole.

  • Placebo

    Other intervention

    no active substance

Treatment groups

38 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: InterventionActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Other interventionPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

High-load working memory performance.

Letter n-back task which includes a 3-back task assessing working memory. The 3-back task requires participants to respond to a letter repeat with two intervening letters (for example, S-m-b-s-g…). Performance will be quantified with the d' measure controlling for false positives. Parallel versions (different sequences) are used for the four test days.

Time frame
Before first intake of study medication and after last intake of study medication of the 7.5-days-treatment periods

Secondary outcomes

1

Reaction time (for correct 3-back responses).

letter n-back task

Time frame
Before first intake of study medication and after last intake of study medication of the 7.5-days-treatment periods
2

Performance in a 0-back task (d') as a measure of attention.

Letter n-back task.Parallel versions (different sequences) are used for the four test days.

Time frame
Before first intake of study medication and after last intake of study medication of the 7.5-days-treatment periods
3

Adaptive verbal working memory capacity test (SPAN) backward.

The SPAN is a computer-based, adaptively administered test based on item response theory (Rasch model; Rasch, 1980). In the study, test form S2 (backward digit span) is used, which captures both storage capacity and executive functions (Baddeley, 2010). Adaptive administration allows for precise, efficient, and individually tailored assessment while minimizing floor and ceiling effects. Test scoring is based on the estimation of a continuous person parameter (θ) using weighted maximum likelihood (Warm, 1989). This parameter reflects the individual's latent working memory ability and is additionally converted into a digit span score with decimal precision, allowing for nuanced interpretation (Gignac \& Weiss, 2015).

Time frame
Before first intake of study medication and after last intake of study medication of the 7.5-days-treatment periods
4

Verbal episodic memory performance measured by immediate and delayed word-list recall task.

In this test a list of 15 selected words will be presented to the participants with a rate of one word per two seconds and the participant should recall the words immediately in writing (immediate recall). Around 15 minutes later the participants are asked to recall the words again (short delay). Number of correct words recalled in each stage is considered as the participant's immediate and delayed recall score respectively. The four 15-words wordlists (A-D) out of the following test are used: Verbaler Lern-und Merkfähigkeitstest, VLMT

Time frame
Before first intake of study medication and after last intake of study medication of the 7.5-days-treatment periods

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Basel

Lead sponsor

Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland

Collaborator